Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v04-needsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v04-needs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v04-needs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v04-needs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v04-needs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v04-needs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01783 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00892 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00357 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
v04-五条戒律NEEDS检查 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
五条戒律(NEEDS)检查:你的生意值得做吗?
R — 原文 (Reading)
用影响力定律照亮你的快车道,用5条快车道戒律做个检查:需求戒律、进入戒律、控制戒律、规模戒律、时间戒律。5条快车道戒律是快车道的试金石,可以用来验证你选择的道路。你的道路是否通向财富?它是快车道吗?
— MJ·德马科, 第29章
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
NEEDS 是5条戒律的首字母缩写,每条戒律对应一个必须回答"是"的问题:
N — Need(需求戒律):这个生意解决真实的、别人的需求吗?不是你的需求,不是你的爱好,不是"我想做这个"——而是市场上有人迫切需要解决的问题。90%的新业务失败,就是因为建立在自私的内部需求上。
E — Entry(进入戒律):这个生意有进入壁垒吗?如果任何人都能在10分钟内开始,赛道已经拥堵不堪。高壁垒 = 竞争小 = 利润高。专利、品牌信任、技术专长、资本门槛都是壁垒。
E — Control(控制戒律):你控制整个生意吗?网络营销商、连锁加盟者、平台带货主播都是"搭便车者"——把控制权交给了别人。司机赚大头,乘客赚零头。
D — Scale(规模戒律):这个生意能服务百万人吗?影响力定律说:影响百万人才能赚百万美元。本地小店的天花板是几百个客户,互联网产品可以服务全球。
S — Time(时间戒律):这个生意能脱离你的时间自动运转吗?如果你不在场生意就停了,你只是给自己创造了一份工作,不是快车道。摇钱树的标志是:你睡觉时它还在赚钱。
每违反一条戒律,财富潜力就下降一个等级。违反3条以上,这个生意基本不可能让你致富。
A1 — 书中的应用
乔的武术工作室(违反N):乔是武术专家,听了"做你喜欢的事"的建议开工作室。他热爱武术但没有分析社区是否有需求。10个月后倒闭,年利润仅2.1万美元。违反需求戒律。
姬莉安的熟食店加盟(违反E+C+T):姬莉安辞去华尔街工作加盟熟食店。进入壁垒低(付钱就能加盟),控制权在总公司(定价、菜单受限制),时间戒律严重违反(每周7天、每天超长工时)。4年后转让业务,重新打工。
作者的网站(满足全部5条):他发现了跨城租车信息缺失的需求(N),自己编程建立了系统(E——技术壁垒),掌控产品、定价、商业模式(C),互联网可以服务全球客户(S),系统自动化运行,他甚至在拉斯维加斯赌博时网站还在赚钱(T)。
A2 — 触发场景 ★
场景:你有一个创业想法,想快速判断是否值得投入;或在几个方向之间犹豫不决;或你已经做了半年生意,想知道为什么增长缓慢。
语言信号:
- "这个想法很酷,但不知道能不能赚钱"
- "做这个的人很多,我还能做吗?"
- "要不要加盟XX品牌?"
- "我应该专注一个方向还是多试试?"
相邻区分:与"SWOT分析"或"商业模式画布"不同,NEEDS检查不是全面评估,而是从快车道的数学原理出发的5个"一票否决"问题。一条戒律被违反不代表生意不能做,但违反越多,致富概率越低。
E — 执行步骤
-
描述你的生意:一句话说清楚——你为谁解决了什么问题?
-
逐条检查:
- N:这个需求是别人的还是你自己的?找3个潜在客户验证(不要问"你会买吗",问"你目前怎么解决这个问题")。
- E:别人需要什么才能复制你?列出你的壁垒清单。如果清单少于3项,壁垒不够。
- C:列出所有你无法独立决定的事(定价、产品方向、获客渠道、收入模式)。如果你依赖的平台/品牌改变政策,你的生意会受影响吗?
- S:你的最大市场容量是多少?计算一个保守值和一个乐观值。乐观值如果达不到7位数年收入,规模不够。
- T:如果明天你休假一个月,生意还能正常运转吗?如果不行,你需要建立系统或团队来替代你。
-
打分:满足5条 = 快车道级别;满足3-4条 = 有机会但需调整;满足0-2条 = 这是工作不是生意。
-
调整方向:针对违反的戒律,列出至少3种改进方案。比如"违反控制戒律" → 建立自己的品牌、私域流量、独立产品。
-
定期复检:每季度重新做一次NEEDS检查。业务在发展,每条戒律的满足情况也在变化。
B — 边界 ★
- NEEDS检查是一个"理想型"工具。现实中没有生意能满足全部5条戒律。作者自己也说,三条高速快车道(互联网、创新、规模效应)是"最有可能"满足全部戒律的路径。
- 不满足NEEDS不代表不能赚钱。很多小生意(本地餐馆、设计工作室、咨询)赚得很好,只是不太可能让你"快速致富"。判断标准取决于你的目标。
- 规模戒律和时间戒律有内在矛盾:追求规模往往需要投入更多时间(至少在初期),而追求时间自由可能会牺牲规模。这个权衡需要根据自己的情况判断。
- 控制戒律容易被误读为"必须100%独立"。事实上,所有生意都有外部依赖(服务器供应商、支付渠道、物流)。关键是核心价值创造环节是否在你手中。
- 这个工具是定性评估,不是定量计算。两个生意各违反2条戒律,不意味着它们的财富潜力相同。需要用判断力结合具体情境。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 82 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A c86848e1d07e
v04-五条戒律NEEDS检查 is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,783 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
en-zh-translation-polish
An English-to-Chinese translation and editing process focused on natural Chinese rather than word-for-word wording.
shortfilm-prompt
Generate cinematic AI shortfilm prompts (works with Seedance 2.0, Xiaoyunque, Sora, Kling, Jimeng, Veo) using the 5-stage structure from Mx-Shell's Zombie Scavenger. Trigger when the user wants transformation sequences, multi-shot narrative shorts, weapon-charge/combat segments, emotional family/pet/farewell…
multi-agent-cn
A Chinese-language system design that makes one main agent assign tasks to five persistent subagents instead of doing the work itself.
gpt-image-2-prompt-engine
A structured prompt-writing tool for GPT-Image-2, using reusable JSON templates and a four-step workflow. It is designed for controlled commercial images such as product photos, posters, infographics, brand visuals, UI screenshots, and character designs.
simp
A relationship-advice skill that helps interpret signals, plan respectful approaches, and write sincere messages for someone you like.
chinese-write-checker
A Chinese-language review process for checking an article from an editor's, reader's, writer's, and publishing platform's viewpoints.