Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v05-vsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v05-vs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v05-vs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v05-vs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v05-vs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v05-vs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01722 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00861 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
v05-生产者vs消费者思维转换 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
生产者 vs 消费者思维转换:从"买"到"卖"的跨越
R — 原文 (Reading)
要将生活的焦点重新聚焦生产,而不是消费。当你重新将你的思维从多数人(消费者)调整到少数人(生产者)的思维,你才能有效地转换团队和忠诚度。没错!首先要成为生产者,其次才是消费者。遵从这个原则,就意味着不要在电视购物节目中购买任何产品,而是要销售产品;不要去挖金矿,要去卖铁锹;不要参加培训班,要举办培训班;不要想着去借钱,要贷款给别人;不要想着去找工作,而要给别人提供工作。
— MJ·德马科, 第17章
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
生产者 vs 消费者不是身份标签,而是一套完整的思维操作系统。核心区分:
消费者思维:我该买什么?哪里更便宜?这个工作能给我多少薪水?我该怎么省钱?怎么找到好 deal?——你的注意力在"获取"和"消耗"上。
生产者思维:我能卖什么?别人的痛点是什么?这个系统能怎么优化?我怎么创造价值?我怎么影响更多人?——你的注意力在"创造"和"提供价值"上。
作者把世界分成两个团队:生产者(少数人)通常富有,消费者(大多数人)通常贫穷。转换不是"从打工到创业"的身份变化,而是先完成思维切换——在你还没有生意之前,就开始用生产者的眼光看世界。
这个框架可以应用于日常生活的每一个决策:刷抖音是消费,拍抖音是生产;抱怨东西难用是消费,思考如何改进是生产;找工作是要进入别人的系统,提供工作是在建造自己的系统。
A1 — 书中的应用
作者在做豪华轿车司机期间,一个乘客问他"在纽约哪里能租到豪华轿车"。普通司机可能回答"不知道"就结束了(消费者思维)。但作者用生产者思维把这个问题变成了商机:他意识到跨城租车信息缺失是一个需求,于是建了一个豪华轿车出租目录网站。这个网站后来成为他第一桶金的起点。
另一个案例:作者7岁时在母亲的车库销售中卖足球闹钟,标价2.55美元无人问津。他本能地想出了一个营销策略——在价格标签上叠加多层更高的价格并划掉,让买家看到"从高价不断降价"的视觉轨迹。实际价格不变,但买家感知到"高价值+划算",第二个看的人就买走了。这就是生产者思维的萌芽——不是被动接受市场,而是主动影响市场。
A2 — 触发场景 ★
场景:你发现自己在想"这个多少钱""哪里能买到""怎么省钱"的时候比想"这个怎么做的""谁能从中受益"的时候多;或你在刷社交媒体时感到空虚;或你想"像富人一样思考"但不知道从哪里开始。
语言信号:
- "这个东西在哪买便宜?"
- "有没有人能做这个?"(vs "我能不能做这个?")
- "这个工作给多少钱?"(vs "这个工作创造什么价值?")
- "什么时候打折?"(vs "怎么定价才能卖出去?")
相邻区分:与"积极心态"或"富人思维"类鸡汤不同,生产者vs消费者转换不是让你"相信就能实现",而是提供一套可操作的思维对照表——每个日常场景下,你可以选择消费端的反应或生产端的反应。它是一种认知肌肉,需要持续训练。
E — 执行步骤
-
24小时消费审计:记录未来24小时内你所有的信息摄入和金钱支出——刷社交媒体、看视频、逛电商、点外卖。每一项后面写一句话:这个行为是在消费还是在生产?
-
每个消费行为找生产替代:刷到一个好视频 → 想"如果我做类似的视频,我会怎么做?"。看到一件好产品 → 想"如果我来卖这个产品,我的卖点是什么?"。抱怨一个问题 → 想"我能为这个问题提供什么解决方案?"。
-
每天做一件"生产者"的事:写一段分享你专业知识的内容、改进一个流程、帮助一个人解决他的问题。不需要赚钱,只需要转换角色——从接收者变为输出者。
-
建立反馈循环:把生产出的内容/产品/服务放到市场上,看世界如何反馈。不要追求完美,追求"完成 → 收集反馈 → 改进"的循环速度。
-
切换收入模型:审视你的主要收入来源。如果100%来自"出卖时间"(工资),制定一个计划将至少10%的收入来源转向"出卖系统/产品/资产"。
-
识别"生产者机会信号":在日常生活中注意那些以"我讨厌……""为什么没有人……""这太麻烦了……"开头的句子。每个抱怨都是一个未被满足的需求,都是生产者思维的切入点。
B — 边界 ★
- 生产者vs消费者是一个有用的思维模型,但不是绝对真理。没有人能"只生产不消费"——你总要吃饭、穿衣、住房。关键在注意力的分配比例,而非完全排除消费。
- "做生产者"不等于"不打工就创业"。你可以在公司内部用生产者思维工作——优化流程、创造价值、建立影响力——而不是把自己定位为"等工资的雇员"。
- 这个框架容易导致"消费鄙视"——认为消费是坏的、可耻的。实际上,消费是经济的正常组成部分。问题不在于消费本身,而在于是否只有消费没有生产。
- 对大多数人来说,从纯消费者到生产者的转变需要时间。不要期望一夜之间改变思维模式。从小处开始(写一条评论、做一个分享、修一个 bug),逐步建立生产者习惯。
- 生产者思维不一定让你更富有,但一定让你更主动。它不能保证成功,但能保证你不再是被动等待机会的人。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 73 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 3f7e40aa2b68
v05-生产者vs消费者思维转换 is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,722 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
accint-commitments
Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via accact(runtime="outcome").
ai-efficiency-audit
Audit a person's or team's weekly workflow, identify which tasks AI can realistically take over, and produce an evidence-based, manager-ready efficiency proposal with hours-saved ranges and a two-week pilot plan. Use this skill whenever the user mentions AI efficiency pressure from leadership, or says any of these …
weekly-report-alchemy
A tool that turns scattered work records—such as chat logs, code commits, calendar entries, and notes—into a structured weekly or monthly report.
screen-detox
A habit-change framework for reducing non-work screen use such as social media, short videos, games, and endless scrolling.
monkey-mind-meditation
A meditation and reflection guide for a busy or anxious mind. It treats recurring thoughts as something to observe and examine, while noting that acute serious mental-health problems need professional care.
company-brain
Your team's shared, AI-ready knowledge base — people, companies, meetings, SOPs, and decisions structured so Claude can answer questions on your team's behalf. Team-scope sibling to second-brain (which is personal-scope). Seven modes — capture (drop something into the right structured dir), compile (process into wiki…