Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v10-20git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v10-20)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v10-20"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v10-20/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v10-20"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v10-20.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01719 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00860 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
20分钟启动法 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
20分钟启动法
R — 原文
"100个人中有99个人是只有在受到金钱的诱惑,或者是受到别人的监视和惩罚的时候才去做事。因为很少有人愿意主动做某事,所以,谁的执行力强,谁就很容易在人生这场游戏中获得财富自由。"
— 金承焕, 第六章
I — 方法论骨架
20分钟启动法是最低门槛的执行力框架,核心思想是'万事开头难,先让车轮转动':
- 不要求完成,只要求开始 — 人类本能抗拒'完成一件事'(太累太耗时),但对'做20分钟'的抵触小得多
- 20分钟是魔数 — 足够短到让人愿意开始,又足够长到进入状态。一旦开始,惯性和'不想中断'的心理会推动继续
- 接受'99%的人不会行动' — 执行力低下不是缺陷而是正常人类状态(Kluge导致)。不为此自责,而是用方法绕过
- 计时器是关键道具 — 精确的20分钟倒计时制造紧迫感,防止大脑'我先休息一下'的拖延
核心思维转换: 从'我要完成这件事'转向'我先做20分钟,20分钟后允许停下'
A1 — 书中的应用
案例 1: 作者建议创建博客
- 问题: 很多人想写博客但从未开始
- 方法论的使用: '打开计时器,精准倒计时20分钟,随便写一篇文章'
- 结论: 不是'写一篇好文章',而是'写20分钟'
- 结果: 作者断言'如果你做到了,你的生活会发生很大的变化'
案例 2: 作者启动YouTube
- 问题: 犹豫6个月做YouTube
- 方法论的使用: 不是等'准备好设备''学习了剪辑''有脚本了',而是先上传第一个视频
- 结论: 先发射再瞄准,而不是先瞄准再发射
案例 3: 无资本创业的第一步
- 问题: 大多数人想创业但从未开始
- 方法论的使用: 先建一个网站/服务页面/LOGO设计模板,用20分钟做出第一个版本
- 结论: 第一版不需要完美,甚至不需要好
A2 — 触发场景
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 用户说'想做XX已经好几个月了但一直没开始'
- 用户说自己'没有时间'做新尝试
- 用户对新想法犹豫不决,找各种准备理由
语言信号
- '我还没准备好'
- '等我有时间了再……'
- '我想先学习一下……'
- '这个需要XX设备/条件'
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
Kluge识别与对抗法的关系: 20分钟启动法是Kluge对抗的具体执行手段——当Kluge说'别多事了'时,打开计时器做20分钟 - 与
周日2小时战略的区别: 20分钟启动法用于突破'开始'的心理门槛,周日2小时用于每周固定时间做新尝试
E — 可执行步骤
当 skill 被激活后,agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
选择一件事
- 让用户从一直拖延的事情中选一件最小的
- 标准:这件事20分钟内一定可以开始(不是完成)
- 完成标准: 用户确定了一件具体的事
-
打开计时器
- 要求用户现在(或约定一个具体时间)打开计时器设置20分钟
- 建议使用手机计时器而非心理计时
- 完成标准: 计时器正在倒计时
- 判停条件: 如果用户说'等一会儿',追问具体时间并约定提醒
-
开始并允许停下
- 明确告知:'20分钟后允许你停下来,不强求继续'
- 完成后询问感受——大多数人会发现自己做了不止20分钟
- 完成标准: 用户完成了20分钟,并反馈结果
B — 边界
不要在以下情况使用此 skill
- 用户需要的是专业指导而非启动动力(如'如何做心脏手术'——20分钟启动法不适用)
- 任务确实需要大量准备时间时(如出差前需要规划路线)
- 用户已经行动过度(工作狂)——需要的是停下而非启动
作者在书中警告的失败模式
- 作者反复强调'100人中有99人不行动'——你不需要做得比99人好,只需要比他们先做
- ce08: Kluge回避新挑战——'别多事了'——20分钟启动法是直接对抗
作者的盲点 / 时代局限
- 对部分患有ADHD或严重拖延症的人,'开始20分钟'可能仍然过高(可能需要'开始30秒')
- 20分钟法对'创意性工作'(写作/设计)有效,对'准备工作复杂'的任务(如装修)效果有限
- 作者假设'开始了就会继续',实际上有些人确实会在20分钟整停下来
容易混淆的邻近方法论
- 番茄工作法(Pomodoro 25分钟)——形式上类似,但番茄法的目的是'保持专注'',20分钟启动法的目的是'突破开始门槛'
- '先发射再瞄准'(Ready, Fire, Aim)——20分钟启动法是这个想法的具体实施工具
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 140 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 9b4323449e81
20分钟启动法 is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,719 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
accint-commitments
Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via accact(runtime="outcome").
ai-efficiency-audit
Audit a person's or team's weekly workflow, identify which tasks AI can realistically take over, and produce an evidence-based, manager-ready efficiency proposal with hours-saved ranges and a two-week pilot plan. Use this skill whenever the user mentions AI efficiency pressure from leadership, or says any of these …
weekly-report-alchemy
A tool that turns scattered work records—such as chat logs, code commits, calendar entries, and notes—into a structured weekly or monthly report.
screen-detox
A habit-change framework for reducing non-work screen use such as social media, short videos, games, and endless scrolling.
monkey-mind-meditation
A meditation and reflection guide for a busy or anxious mind. It treats recurring thoughts as something to observe and examine, while noting that acute serious mental-health problems need professional care.
company-brain
Your team's shared, AI-ready knowledge base — people, companies, meetings, SOPs, and decisions structured so Claude can answer questions on your team's behalf. Team-scope sibling to second-brain (which is personal-scope). Seven modes — capture (drop something into the right structured dir), compile (process into wiki…