Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v11git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v11)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v11"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v11/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v11"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v11.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.01751 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00875 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
赚钱根本原理 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
赚钱根本原理
R — 原文
"所有赚钱的活动大都集中在下面两种:让对方舒服。让对方幸福。如果无视这个原则却想赚钱,你要么成为一个骗子,要么一事无成。"
— 金承焕, 第七章
I — 方法论骨架
赚钱不是目的而是结果——你解决了一个多大的问题,就能获得多大的回报。核心框架:
赚钱 = 解决问题的两条路径:
- 让对方舒服 — 消除不适感、麻烦、痛苦(如:失恋咨询、LOGO设计、SEO优化)
- 让对方幸福 — 创造愉悦、满足渴望、实现梦想(如:美食、旅行、知识付费)
任何不能归入这两个方向的赚钱方式要么是欺诈要么不可持续。
实操方法论:
- 观察抱怨 — 日常生活中人们的每一个抱怨背后都是一个商业机会
- 新手帮菜鸟 — 不需要成为专家,只要比目标客户强一点就能开始
- 先解决小问题 — 从小问题入手测试需求,验证后再放大
核心思维转换:从'如何赚钱'转向'我能解决谁的什么问题'
A1 — 书中的应用
案例 1: 分手复合咨询
- 问题: 失恋的人痛苦(让对方舒服——消除情感痛苦)
- 方法论的使用: 作者和智韩建立分手复合咨询网站,定价19000韩元
- 结论: 失恋是强烈的'不适感',人们愿意为缓解痛苦付费
- 结果: 下个月收入达到3000万韩元
案例 2: 21岁青年LOGO设计
- 问题: 小商家/菜鸟需要LOGO但请不起专业设计师,自己做又不会(让对方舒服——降低设计门槛)
- 方法论的使用: 用设计平台自动生成LOGO,定价2-3万韩元
- 结论: 解决了'便宜且可用'的需求
- 结果: 2个月赚5000万韩元
案例 3: 欲望书吧改造
- 问题: 顾客想在江南区找到好咖啡厅(让对方幸福——创造舒适环境)
- 方法论的使用: 不装修不花钱,只做SEO排名和Instagram
- 结论: 解决了'找到好地方'的需求
- 结果: 月销售额从90万飙升至2000万韩元
A2 — 触发场景
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 用户说'我想赚钱但不知道做什么'
- 用户听说某个生意机会时第一反应是'谁会花这个钱?'
- 用户想创业但不知道选什么方向
语言信号
- '我想赚钱但不知道做什么'
- '什么生意比较好做?'
- '谁会花这个钱啊?'
- '这个真的有人需要吗?'
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
无资本创业框架的关系: 赚钱根本原理是'识别机会'的思维模型,无资本创业是'如何零成本启动'的执行框架 - 与
部队指挥者模型的关系: 赚钱是创造价值的过程,部队指挥者是创造被动收入系统后的状态
E — 可执行步骤
当 skill 被激活后,agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
找到不适感或渴望
- 问:'你在日常生活中有哪些抱怨?别人常找你抱怨什么?'
- 问:'什么事情让人们不厌其烦地花时间去做?'
- 每个抱怨标记:这是'不舒服'(需要消除)还是'不幸福'(需要满足)?
- 完成标准: 列出至少3个可商业化的抱怨或渴望
-
验证需求真实性
- 问:'这个问题是否足够具体?是否有一群人愿意为此付费?'
- 如果无法判断,建议先用'新手帮菜鸟'模型小规模测试
- 完成标准: 筛选出至少1个有明确付费意愿的需求
-
设计最小解决方案
- 不是'做一个完美的产品',而是'20分钟能提供的解决方案是什么'
- 用20分钟启动法创建第一个版本
- 完成标准: 确定了一个可立即执行的最小方案
B — 边界
不要在以下情况使用此 skill
- 用户寻求的是投资理财建议(股票、基金)——赚钱根本原理是商业创业框架,不是投资框架
- 用户想做的是非法或不道德生意——'让对方舒服/幸福'的道德底线不可突破
- 用户没有行动意愿,只想要'快速致富秘籍'
作者在书中警告的失败模式
- ce23: 无资本创业中的自我否定——'谁会花这个钱?'——用自己的消费习惯否定市场需求
- ce28: 周末浪费时间而非投资自己——从不去观察和发现需求
- ce30: 专业人士的傲慢——'我不需要营销'——不知道客户需要被触达
作者的盲点 / 时代局限
- 作者的两分法(舒服/幸福)过于简化——很多赚钱机会同时涉及两者
- 作者是韩国人,案例集中在韩国市场,某些需求在跨文化环境下可能不成立
- '解决问题'导向的创业需要一定的同理心和观察力,不是所有人都具备
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 149 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 73b3a35e68da
赚钱根本原理 is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,751 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
en-zh-translation-polish
An English-to-Chinese translation and editing process focused on natural Chinese rather than word-for-word wording.
shortfilm-prompt
Generate cinematic AI shortfilm prompts (works with Seedance 2.0, Xiaoyunque, Sora, Kling, Jimeng, Veo) using the 5-stage structure from Mx-Shell's Zombie Scavenger. Trigger when the user wants transformation sequences, multi-shot narrative shorts, weapon-charge/combat segments, emotional family/pet/farewell…
multi-agent-cn
A Chinese-language system design that makes one main agent assign tasks to five persistent subagents instead of doing the work itself.
gpt-image-2-prompt-engine
A structured prompt-writing tool for GPT-Image-2, using reusable JSON templates and a four-step workflow. It is designed for controlled commercial images such as product photos, posters, infographics, brand visuals, UI screenshots, and character designs.
simp
A relationship-advice skill that helps interpret signals, plan respectful approaches, and write sincere messages for someone you like.
chinese-write-checker
A Chinese-language review process for checking an article from an editor's, reader's, writer's, and publishing platform's viewpoints.