Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v12git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v12)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v12"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v12/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v12"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v12.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.01810 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00905 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00362 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
部队指挥者模型 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
部队指挥者模型
R — 原文
"部队指挥者可以指挥大量的士兵,即使在他们睡觉的时间,士兵们也会按照指示出去战斗。企业老板、图书作者、YouTuber、在线课程销售者、股票投资者不是通过按小时计酬来赚钱,而是通过其他手段来间接赚钱。"
— 金承焕, 第七章
I — 方法论骨架
部队指挥者模型是一个收入形态的三层级框架,用军事类比让抽象的'被动收入'概念具象化:
- 士兵(按小时计酬) — 不工作就没收入。无论时薪高低(从洗碗工到律师),本质上都是用时间换钱。睡觉时收入停止。
- 将军(高时薪但仍是士兵) — 医生、律师、顶级咨询师——时薪很高但依然需要亲自工作。赚更多但更忙,没有真正的自由。
- 部队指挥者(被动收入系统) — 即使睡觉也有人在工作:员工在运营、视频在被观看、书在被购买、股票在增值、课程在被购买。
通往财富自由的路径就是从士兵升级为将军最终成为部队指挥者。每个'士兵'都是一个被动收入单元——一条YouTube视频、一本书、一门在线课程、一只分红股票。指挥者不需要所有士兵都完美,只要有足够多的士兵在睡觉时也在战斗即可。
A1 — 书中的应用
案例 1: 作者的升级路径
- 问题: 从咨询师(士兵——按小时收费)起步
- 方法论的使用: 通过做YouTube(创建被动内容资产)向指挥者转型
- 结论: 视频一旦发布就持续产生价值,睡觉时也在被观看
- 结果: 事情比3年前少了很多,自动收入增加3倍以上
案例 2: 承浩从士兵到指挥者
- 问题: 大企业程序员(士兵——月薪400万)
- 方法论的使用: 存钱→学拍卖→攒资本→开创无人学习咖啡厅(系统),2年扩张到13家
- 结论: 13家咖啡厅在睡觉时也在产生收入
- 结果: 34岁拥有13家无人学习咖啡厅、土地和葡萄酒酒吧
案例 3: 作者母亲的房地产投资
- 问题: 50岁前是打工者(士兵),负债累累
- 方法论的使用: 学投资→买房产→收租金(部队指挥者)
- 结论: 租金收入在睡觉时也在产生
- 结果: 10年内从负债人变成数十亿韩元资产持有者
A2 — 触发场景
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 用户感觉'用时间换钱'无法突破收入上限
- 用户想知道如何建立被动收入系统
- 用户想明确自己当前的财富自由阶段和下一步路径
语言信号
- '我觉得自己是在用时间换钱'
- '我赚得多了但更忙了'
- '我不知道怎么建立被动收入'
- '我想财富自由但不知道从哪里开始'
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
赚钱根本原理的关系: 赚钱原理教'如何创造价值',部队指挥者教'如何把价值系统化成为被动收入' - 与
提坦道具组合策略的关系: 提坦道具教'如何组合技能',部队指挥者教'如何把技能转化为被动收入系统'
E — 可执行步骤
当 skill 被激活后,agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
定位当前阶段
- 帮助用户判断自己是士兵/将军还是部队指挥者
- 问:'如果你明天不工作,收入会变成多少?'
- 如果答案接近0,就是士兵阶段
- 完成标准: 用户清晰知道自己的当前层级
-
设计第一个'士兵'
- 帮用户确定第一个被动收入单元
- 选项:一篇教程文章/一条教学视频/一本电子书/一门迷你课程
- 标准:不需要完美,只需要能'在睡觉时被消费'
- 完成标准: 确定了一个可执行的被动收入单元方案
-
制定升级路径
- 士兵→将军:提升单位时间价值(专注高价值技能)
- 将军→指挥者:创建系统/内容/产品
- 完成标准: 用户有一个明确的阶段升级路线图
B — 边界
不要在以下情况使用此 skill
- 用户急需解决短期现金流问题时——先解决生存再布局被动收入
- 用户尚未有稳定收入来源——先有士兵收入再考虑指挥者
- 用户期待'快速被动收入'——被动收入的建立通常需要1-3年的投入期
作者在书中警告的失败模式
- ce14: 只读书不实践——空有理论没有实际行动去创建被动收入系统
- ce28: 周末浪费时间而非投资自己——从不为创建被动收入系统付出时间
- ce29: 打工只为糊口——浪费宝贵的工作时间,不学习不积累
作者的盲点 / 时代局限
- 作者的被动收入路径(YouTube/书/课程)依赖个人品牌建设,不是人人都能做到
- 在韩国成功的商业模式在跨文化环境下可能不适用
- 被动收入不是真正的'被动'——创建系统需要大量前期投入,维护也需要时间
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 143 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 53ff4e4670cc
部队指挥者模型 is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 1,810 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
bookkeeping-cn
A Chinese-language bookkeeping assistant that turns transaction records into organized income, spending, budgets, and reconciliation reports. Reconciliation means comparing records to find differences.
wps-salary
A Chinese payroll calculator and salary-slip generator. It calculates employee deductions for social insurance, housing funds, and personal income tax, then creates Excel salary slips.
wps-budget
A spreadsheet generator for planning and tracking budgets, with categories, subtotals, totals, and comparison calculations. It supports department, project, event, household, and marketing budgets.
wps-financial-report
A financial statement generator for the three standard company reports: the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.
dangjr
Dan G Jr — Venture capital theory & early-stage investing. Triggers: venturecapital, earlystageinvesting, fundeconomics, vcdiversification, dealflow, startupcapitalefficiency.
rory-odriscoll
Rory O'Driscoll — Partner at Scale Venture Partners; recurring 20VC co-host. Triggers: enterpriseSaaS, growthinvesting, publicmarkets, SaaSeconomics.