Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v15git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v15)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v15"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v15/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v15"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v15.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.01746 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00873 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
无资本创业框架 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
无资本创业框架
R — 原文
'不一定要高手去帮助菜鸟,因为有些菜鸟所需要的帮助真的是一些新手就可以提供的。因此,这个时候提供帮助的人是新手也无所谓。这是新手帮助菜鸟就能赚钱的时代。'
— 金承焕, 第七章
I — 方法论骨架
无资本创业框架的核心是'新手教菜鸟'模型——不需要成为专家再创业,只需要比你的目标客户强一点点:
- 找到比小白强一点点的领域 — 你不需要是前1%的专家,只需要比目标客户多知道一点点。你已经踩过的坑、已经解决的问题,对还没踩到的人来说就是有价值的服务。
- 利用免费平台 — 互联网消除了地理位置和信息壁垒。利用免费平台(博客、Instagram、电商平台)建立服务页面,零成本启动。
- 定价低于专家 — 用低价获取第一批客户,在服务过程中积累经验。
- 边做边学 — 不是准备好了再开始,而是在服务中学习。每一单客户都在帮你升级。
- 从服务到产品化 — 从一对一服务开始验证需求,然后逐步产品化(模板/课程/系统)。
核心洞察:互联网时代,新手帮菜鸟是起点,只要开始了就能在过程中升级。
A1 — 书中的应用
案例 1: 21岁青年LOGO设计创业
- 问题: 对设计一窍不通,零基础零经验零资本
- 方法论的使用: 按作者博客文章照做——建LOGO设计网站、定价2-3万韩元、用设计平台自动生成、Instagram广告投放
- 结论: 不需要成为设计师,比菜鸟懂一点就够了
- 结果: 2个月赚5000万韩元,公司成为Kmong最佳设计公司
案例 2: 作者分手复合咨询
- 问题: 无资本无背景
- 方法论的使用: 建立分手复合咨询网站(免费平台),定价19000韩元开始
- 结论: 不需要是情感专家,只要比刚分手的人理性一点就能提供价值
- 结果: 下个月收入达到3000万韩元
案例 3: 亲戚弟弟博客营销
- 问题: 手机店月收入从1000万降至600万,不会网络营销
- 方法论的使用: 学习博客营销——比同行先掌握一个B级技能
- 结论: 一个B级营销技能就足以改变生意格局
- 结果: 1年内月收入从600万升至4000万韩元
A2 — 触发场景
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- 用户说'我没钱没经验能创业吗'
- 用户听说一个生意机会时第一反应是'谁会花这个钱?'
- 用户想创业但觉得自己'不够格'
语言信号
- '我没钱没经验怎么创业?'
- '谁会花这个钱啊?'
- '我还没准备好'
- '这怎么可能?'
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
赚钱根本原理的关系: 赚钱原理教'识别什么值得做',无资本创业教'怎么做' - 与
20分钟启动法的关系: 无资本创业的第一步就是20分钟启动法——先做一个最小版本出来
E — 可执行步骤
当 skill 被激活后,agent 应按以下步骤执行:
-
识别可服务的需求
- 问:'你比周围大多数人强的是什么?(即使只是强一点点)'
- 问:'你最近解决了什么问题?别人是不是也面临同样的问题?'
- 完成标准: 确定一个你比目标客户强一点点的服务方向
-
创建最小服务页面
- 用免费平台(博客/社交媒体/电商平台)建立一个服务页面
- 写清楚:你提供什么、解决什么问题、定价多少
- 完成标准: 服务页面上线,可以通过链接访问
- 判停条件: 如果用户说'要不要先学习一下',提醒他'在服务中学习'——不需要准备好再开始
-
获取第一个客户
- 用20分钟启动法发布服务信息
- 建议从熟人/朋友开始,或低价甚至免费换第一个案例
- 完成标准: 获得了第一个付费客户(哪怕只收了1块钱)
B — 边界
不要在以下情况使用此 skill
- 用户已有充足资本和明确方向——不需要从'新手教菜鸟'开始
- 需要大量资金投入的实体生意(如开工厂)
- 用户期待的是一夜暴富——无资本创业需要耐心和服务积累
作者在书中警告的失败模式
- ce23: 无资本创业中的自我否定——用自己的消费习惯否定市场需求
- ce01: 自我意识防御机制——对生意机会的第一反应是贬低而非探索
- ce30: 专业人士的傲慢——不屑于做'低级'的服务
作者的盲点 / 时代局限
- 作者案例集中在韩国互联网环境(naver博客等),在中国可能需要对标国内平台(小红书/抖音/知乎)
- '新手教菜鸟'模型在高度监管的行业(医疗/法律)可能涉及资质风险
- 低价竞争策略可能陷入'低价陷阱'——客户只认低价,后期提价困难
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 145 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A bbc0814952ae
无资本创业框架 is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,746 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
en-zh-translation-polish
An English-to-Chinese translation and editing process focused on natural Chinese rather than word-for-word wording.
shortfilm-prompt
Generate cinematic AI shortfilm prompts (works with Seedance 2.0, Xiaoyunque, Sora, Kling, Jimeng, Veo) using the 5-stage structure from Mx-Shell's Zombie Scavenger. Trigger when the user wants transformation sequences, multi-shot narrative shorts, weapon-charge/combat segments, emotional family/pet/farewell…
multi-agent-cn
A Chinese-language system design that makes one main agent assign tasks to five persistent subagents instead of doing the work itself.
gpt-image-2-prompt-engine
A structured prompt-writing tool for GPT-Image-2, using reusable JSON templates and a four-step workflow. It is designed for controlled commercial images such as product photos, posters, infographics, brand visuals, UI screenshots, and character designs.
simp
A relationship-advice skill that helps interpret signals, plan respectful approaches, and write sincere messages for someone you like.
chinese-write-checker
A Chinese-language review process for checking an article from an editor's, reader's, writer's, and publishing platform's viewpoints.