Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add R2h1/my-book-skills --skill v22-5-2git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/R2h1/my-book-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v22-5-2)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v22-5-2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v22-5-2/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v22-5-2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/r2h1/my-book-skills/v22-5-2.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01891 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
five-to-two-time-trade-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
5对2时间交易分析框架
R — 原文 (Reading)
最终,你把灵魂卖给了星期一到星期五,用星期六和星期日作为薪水来补偿。5对2的投资回报率是-60%。如果你有孩子,孩子不会等到周末才长大。当你进行5对2交易的时候,孩子都长大了,你也早已人过半百。5对2的回报如此糟糕,但人们却接受了这种安排,把它看作成年人的正常生活。 — MJ·德马科, 第10章
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
这是一个用投资回报率逻辑分析时间交易的推理方法。核心逻辑:
把工作视为时间投资——你投入5天的受约束时间(周一到周五),换回2天的自由时间(周末)。
计算投资回报率:
- 投入:5天受约束时间(工作+通勤+工作相关准备)
- 产出:2天自由时间(周末)
- 回报率:(2-5)/5 = -60%
如果把这个逻辑应用于金钱投资——"今天给我5美元,明天还你2美元"——任何人都会拒绝。但人们却接受了同样逻辑的时间交易,并将其视为"正常"。
更残酷的真相是:真正的"5"往往比5天更长(加班、通勤、出差、工作邮件),真正的"2"往往比2天更短(家务、社交义务、家庭责任)。实际回报率可能在-70%到-80%之间。
反转目标:快车道的目标是逆转这个比率——从5对2降到3对4、1对6,最终达到0对7(完全自由)。
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
论坛用户的5年储蓄经历:一位快车道论坛用户分享了他5年的慢车道生活:租住不到10平方米的廉价房间,几乎每天工作,没有休息日,节衣缩食。5年存下5万美元,但形容自己的生活"像监狱一样"。他把自己锁死在5对2(实际上是6对1甚至7对0)的交易中,用青春和自由换取微薄的储蓄。
姬莉安的熟食店加盟:姬莉安辞去华尔街工作加盟熟食店,以为自己"做了自己的老板"。实际上她每周工作7天、每天超长时间——她的交易是7对0。利润被特许经营费蚕食,无力雇人解放自己。4年后转让业务,重新回去做朝九晚五的工作。讽刺的是,朝九晚五(5对2)对她来说已经是"改善"了。
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger)
触发场景:
- 你在审视自己的时间分配,想知道当前生活是否"划算"时
- 你考虑换工作——更忙但钱更多,或更闲但钱更少——想量化评估时
- 你感到周末太短、周一来得太快时
- 你在考虑"要不要为了XX加班"时
语言信号:
- "周末过得太快了"
- "周日晚上就开始焦虑"
- "什么时候才能退休啊"
- "等我熬过这阵子就好了"
- "孩子怎么突然就长大了"
与相邻skill的区分:这个skill聚焦于量化分析"工作投入vs自由产出"的比例,是一个具体的数学计算工具。v18-财富三位一体模型关注的是更宏观的生活质量评估(健康+家庭+自由),5对2分析是其中一个维度的量化工具。
E — 可执行步骤 (Execution)
当技能被激活后,按以下步骤执行:
- 计算你的真实"5":每周花在工作和与工作相关活动上的总天数。包括:上班、通勤、加班、出差、工作邮件、周末加班、工作焦虑时间。换算成天数(8小时=1天)。
- 计算你的真实"2":每周真正属于自己的自由时间。扣除:家务、睡眠(必要的8小时不算扣除)、家庭义务、社交义务、恢复性休息(什么都不做也算自由)。
- 计算你的实际回报率:(自由天数-工作天数)/工作天数 × 100%。如果低于-60%,进入预警。
- 计算你的时薪"自由时间成本":月收入 ÷ (工作天数×8小时) = 每小时名义收入。再问自己:每小时收入能买回多少自由时间?
- 制定改善路径:列出3种方式改善5对2比率——(a)降低"5":换更轻松的工作、远程办公、提高效率;(b)提高"2":减少非工作义务、外包家务;(c)改变交易结构:创业建立被动收入系统,目标是0对7。
- 设置5对2预警线:当你的比率跌破某个阈值(如6对1),立即触发行动——不要等到完全崩溃才做改变。
B — 边界 (Boundary)
不适用场景:
- 没有稳定工作/收入模式的自由职业者、创业者——他们的时间结构不是标准的5对2,需要调整公式为"投入产出比"。
- 短期的高强度工作期(如创业初期、项目冲刺)——5对2是长期生活方式的评估工具,不适合短期权衡。
- 从工作中获得极大意义感和满足感的人——如果你的"5"本身也是你享受的,那么它不完全是"受约束时间"。
失败模式:
- 把5对2当作辞职的借口——"5对2回报太差所以我直接辞职"是错误应用。正确的应用是先建立替代收入系统再改变工作结构。
- 忽视工作带来的非金钱收益——社保、人脉、技能积累、职业发展。5对2只计算了时间和金钱,忽略了这些隐性收益。
- 只看比率不看绝对值——一个5对2但月薪10万的人和一个5对2但月薪5千的人,面对的策略完全不同。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 91 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 845b571546e7
five-to-two-time-trade-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository R2h1/my-book-skills (2 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,891 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
accint-commitments
Triage acc's open promises and close them with honest real-world verdicts via accact(runtime="outcome").
ai-efficiency-audit
Audit a person's or team's weekly workflow, identify which tasks AI can realistically take over, and produce an evidence-based, manager-ready efficiency proposal with hours-saved ranges and a two-week pilot plan. Use this skill whenever the user mentions AI efficiency pressure from leadership, or says any of these …
weekly-report-alchemy
A tool that turns scattered work records—such as chat logs, code commits, calendar entries, and notes—into a structured weekly or monthly report.
screen-detox
A habit-change framework for reducing non-work screen use such as social media, short videos, games, and endless scrolling.
monkey-mind-meditation
A meditation and reflection guide for a busy or anxious mind. It treats recurring thoughts as something to observe and examine, while noting that acute serious mental-health problems need professional care.
company-brain
Your team's shared, AI-ready knowledge base — people, companies, meetings, SOPs, and decisions structured so Claude can answer questions on your team's behalf. Team-scope sibling to second-brain (which is personal-scope). Seven modes — capture (drop something into the right structured dir), compile (process into wiki…