Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/plugin install xorioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00728 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00291 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
generate-tests-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate Tests for Coverage Gaps
Scan the entire project for under-tested code and generate tests to fill coverage gaps, prioritizing critical business logic.
Workflow
Step 1: Detect All Languages and Frameworks
Scan the project root to detect all languages and frameworks present:
Languages:
.rsfiles orCargo.toml→ Rust.ts/.tsxfiles orpackage.json→ TypeScript.pyfiles orpyproject.toml/setup.py→ Python
Frameworks:
Cargo.tomlcontainsegui→ eguipackage.jsoncontainsreact→ Reactpackage.jsoncontainsvue→ Vue.jspackage.jsoncontainsthree→ Three.jspackage.jsoncontainsspark→ SparkJSDockerfileordocker-compose.ymlexists → Docker- AWS SDK deps, CDK, CloudFormation, or SAM templates → AWS
Step 2: Load All Matching Standards
Read all matching standards files from ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/tests/references/:
- One
test-standards-{language}.mdper detected language - One
test-standards-{framework}.mdper detected framework
Step 3: Parallel Analysis
Launch test-analyzer agents in parallel, split by source directories for speed. Each gets its language's standards. Example splits:
crates/→ Rust analyzer with Rust + egui standardstools/renderer/→ TypeScript analyzer with TS + Three.js standardssrc/→ whichever language is present there
Also launch the test-docs-advisor agent in parallel for a full project documentation review.
Step 4: Present Comprehensive Gap Analysis
Aggregate results from all analyzers and present:
- Project test health summary — overall coverage assessment per language/module
- Critical gaps — highest risk items across the project
- High/Medium/Low gaps — remaining items by priority
- Documentation suggestions from the docs advisor
Ask the user which gaps to fill. Suggest starting with Critical items.
Step 5: Generate Tests
Launch test-generator agents — parallelize across independent modules:
- One agent per language/crate/package if they're independent
- Each gets only its language + framework standards
- Each gets its subset of the gap list
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A f254d7ac59a8
generate-tests-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 728 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
dart-test
DART Test: unit tests, integration tests, CI validation, and debugging.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.