Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/plugin install xorioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-module)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-module"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-module/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-module"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin/generate-tests-module.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00707 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00353 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
generate-tests-module scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate Tests for a Module
Generate unit and integration tests for a specific file, directory, or module.
Workflow
Step 1: Validate Target
Verify that $ARGUMENTS specifies a valid path. If no path is provided, ask the user for one.
Check the path exists (file or directory). If it's a directory, it will be scanned recursively for source files.
Step 2: Detect Languages and Frameworks
From the target files, detect:
Languages:
.rsfiles orCargo.tomlin parent hierarchy → Rust.ts/.tsxfiles orpackage.jsonin parent hierarchy → TypeScript.pyfiles orpyproject.toml/setup.pyin parent hierarchy → Python
Frameworks (check dependency files for these strings):
Cargo.tomlcontainsegui→ egui (only if target files import/use egui)package.jsoncontainsreact→ React (only if target files import react)package.jsoncontainsvue→ Vue.js (only if target files import vue)package.jsoncontainsthree→ Three.js (only if target files import three)package.jsoncontainsspark→ SparkJS (only if target files import spark)Dockerfileordocker-compose.ymlin target path → Docker- AWS SDK imports in target files → AWS
Step 3: Load Standards
Read ONLY the matching standards files:
- Language:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/tests/references/test-standards-{language}.md - Framework:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/tests/references/test-standards-{framework}.md
Only load framework standards if the target files actually use that framework.
Step 4: Analyze
Launch the test-analyzer agent with:
- Scope: "module" — include the target path
- The matching language + framework standards content
- Instruction to analyze only the specified module
Step 5: Present Gap Analysis
Show the user the prioritized gap list ranked by risk:
- Critical gaps first
- Include existing test coverage summary
- Note any test infrastructure found (helpers, fixtures)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 82 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 668dd1ad4ffe
generate-tests-module is a skill published in the GitHub repository radumarias/xorio-claude-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 707 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
nw-fp-clojure
Clojure language-specific patterns, data-first modeling, REPL-driven development, and spec.
mobiai-ios-testing
Use when writing or running tests in an iOS project — unit tests, UI tests, snapshot tests, choosing the right framework.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
testing-llm
LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.