Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval --skill routing-subtour-eliminationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Raidriar7170/hermes-skillevalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/routing-subtour-elimination)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/routing-subtour-elimination"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/routing-subtour-elimination/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/routing-subtour-elimination"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/routing-subtour-elimination.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.02140 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.01070 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00428 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
routing-subtour-elimination scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to routing-subtour-elimination — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 256 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Routing Subtour Elimination
In routing MIPs, degree and continuity constraints are not enough. A vehicle can have one depot-to-depot path and a separate closed cycle among stations. Add subtour-elimination constraints whenever binary arc variables decide routes.
Use this base notation:
START = "depot_start"
END = "depot_end"
vehicles = range(K)
stations = range(n)
from_nodes = [START, *stations]
to_nodes = [*stations, END]
arcs = [(i, j) for i in from_nodes for j in to_nodes if i != j and not (i == START and j == END)]
x = {(v, i, j): model.addVar(vtype="B", name=f"x_{v}_{i}_{j}") for v in vehicles for i, j in arcs}
Required Base Route Constraints
Subtour elimination assumes each selected station has matching inbound and outbound route arcs.
for v in vehicles:
model.addCons(quicksum(x[v, START, j] for j in stations) == 1)
model.addCons(quicksum(x[v, i, END] for i in stations) == 1)
for i in stations:
incoming = quicksum(x[v, j, i] for j in from_nodes if j != i)
outgoing = quicksum(x[v, i, j] for j in to_nodes if j != i)
model.addCons(incoming == outgoing)
model.addCons(outgoing <= 1)
The subtour methods below prevent station-only cycles that are disconnected from START.
1. MTZ Order Constraints
MTZ adds an order variable for each vehicle-station pair. If vehicle v travels from station i to station j, then order[v, j] must be greater than order[v, i].
order = {
(v, i): model.addVar(vtype="C", lb=1, ub=max(1, n), name=f"order_{v}_{i}")
for v in vehicles
for i in stations
}
for v in vehicles:
for i in stations:
for j in stations:
if i != j:
model.addCons(order[v, i] - order[v, j] + n * x[v, i, j] <= n - 1)
Pros:
- Compact:
O(K n^2)constraints andO(K n)extra variables. - Easy to implement in common Python optimization APIs.
- Good default for small and medium benchmark instances.
Cons:
- LP relaxation is weak compared with cutset or flow formulations.
- Can be slow for larger VRPs.
- Order variables are artificial; do not interpret them as service times unless you also model time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 256 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 211306948184
routing-subtour-elimination is a skill published in the GitHub repository Raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval (123 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 2,140 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to routing-subtour-elimination, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fba-simulator
Run Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) and related constraint-based simulations using COBRApy. Covers standard FBA, parsimonious FBA (pFBA), Flux Variability Analysis (FVA), loopless FBA, gene/reaction knockouts, and carbon source swapping. Outputs flux distributions and CSV files.
gsmm-validator
Validate a COBRApy genome-scale metabolic model for mass/charge balance, stoichiometric consistency, biomass producibility, dead-end metabolites, thermodynamic loops, and GPR rule formatting. Outputs a structured validation report with errors and warnings.
gsmm-builder
Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.
stat-result-validator
Validate statistical research outputs for formulation quality, method-to- problem alignment, theory presence, experimental evidence, fair comparison, artifact completeness, and final-claim consistency.
meta-analysis
Statistical methods for combining results across multiple studies. Use when aggregating cross-study or cross-experiment results.
mixed-precision
Use FP16/BF16 mixed precision to accelerate training and reduce memory. Use when optimizing GPU performance.