Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval --skill skillsbench__powerliftinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Raidriar7170/hermes-skillevalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/skillsbench__powerlifting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/skillsbench__powerlifting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/skillsbench__powerlifting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/skillsbench__powerlifting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval/skillsbench__powerlifting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.04271 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.02135 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00854 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00427 |
Grade A, and why
powerlifting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to powerlifting — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 398 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Calculating Powerlifting Scores as a Professional Coach
Dynamic Objective Team Scoring (Dots)
In the world of powerlifting, comparing lifters across different body weights is essential to /determine relative strength and fairness in competition. This is where the DOTS score—short for “Dynamic Objective Team Scoring”—comes into play. It’s a widely-used formula that helps level the playing field by standardizing performances regardless of a lifter’s body weight. Whether you’re new to powerlifting or a seasoned competitor, understanding the DOTS score is crucial for evaluating progress and competing effectively. This section is from powerliftpro.
What is the DOTS Score?
The DOTS score is a mathematical formula used to normalize powerlifting totals based on a lifter’s body weight. It provides a single number that represents a lifter’s relative strength, allowing for fair comparisons across all weight classes.
The score takes into account:
- The lifter's total: The combined weight lifted in the squat, bench press, and deadlift.
- Body weight: The lifter’s weight on competition day.
The DOTS Formula
For real powerlifting nerds who want to calculate their DOTS longhand (remember to show all work! sorry, old math class joke), the DOTS formula is as follows:
DOTS Score=Total Weight Lifted (kg)×a+b(BW)+c(BW2)+d(BW3)+e(BW4)500
Here:
- Total Weight Lifted (kg): Your combined total from the squat, bench press, and deadlift.
- BW: Your body weight in kilograms.
- a, b, c, d, e: Coefficients derived from statistical modeling to ensure accurate scaling across various body weights.
These coefficients are carefully designed to balance the advantage heavier lifters might have in absolute strength and the lighter lifters’ advantage in relative strength.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 398 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 8767b92aa108
powerlifting is a skill published in the GitHub repository Raidriar7170/hermes-skilleval (123 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 4,271 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to powerlifting, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fba-simulator
Run Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) and related constraint-based simulations using COBRApy. Covers standard FBA, parsimonious FBA (pFBA), Flux Variability Analysis (FVA), loopless FBA, gene/reaction knockouts, and carbon source swapping. Outputs flux distributions and CSV files.
gsmm-validator
Validate a COBRApy genome-scale metabolic model for mass/charge balance, stoichiometric consistency, biomass producibility, dead-end metabolites, thermodynamic loops, and GPR rule formatting. Outputs a structured validation report with errors and warnings.
gsmm-builder
Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.
stat-result-validator
Validate statistical research outputs for formulation quality, method-to- problem alignment, theory presence, experimental evidence, fair comparison, artifact completeness, and final-claim consistency.
meta-analysis
Statistical methods for combining results across multiple studies. Use when aggregating cross-study or cross-experiment results.
mixed-precision
Use FP16/BF16 mixed precision to accelerate training and reduce memory. Use when optimizing GPU performance.