Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearchnpx agentmods add skills/raja21068/autoresearch/experiment-bridgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/experiment-bridge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/experiment-bridge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/experiment-bridge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/experiment-bridge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/experiment-bridge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.03714 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01857 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00743 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00371 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-bridge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to experiment-bridge — 63 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 330 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow 1.5: Experiment Bridge
Implement and deploy experiments from plan: $ARGUMENTS
Overview
This skill bridges Workflow 1 (idea discovery + method refinement) and Workflow 2 (auto review loop). It takes the experiment plan and turns it into running experiments with initial results.
Workflow 1 output: This skill: Workflow 2 input:
refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md → implement → GPT-5.4 review → deploy → collect → initial results ready
refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md code (cross-model) /run-experiment for /auto-review-loop
refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md
Constants
- CODE_REVIEW = true — GPT-5.4 xhigh reviews experiment code before deployment. Catches logic bugs before wasting GPU hours. Set
falseto skip. - AUTO_DEPLOY = true — Automatically deploy experiments after implementation + review. Set
falseto manually inspect code before deploying. - SANITY_FIRST = true — Run the sanity-stage experiment first (smallest, fastest) before launching the rest. Catches setup bugs early.
- MAX_PARALLEL_RUNS = 4 — Maximum number of experiments to deploy in parallel (limited by available GPUs).
- BASE_REPO = false — GitHub repo URL to use as base codebase. When set, clone the repo first and implement experiments on top of it. When
false(default), write code from scratch or reuse existing project files. - COMPACT = false — When
true, (1) readidea-stage/IDEA_CANDIDATES.mdinstead of fullidea-stage/IDEA_REPORT.mdif available, (2) append experiment results toEXPERIMENT_LOG.mdafter collection.
Override:
/experiment-bridge "EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md" — compact: true, base repo: https://github.com/org/project
Inputs
This skill expects one or more of:
refine-logs/EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md(best) — claim-driven experiment roadmap from/experiment-planrefine-logs/EXPERIMENT_TRACKER.md— run-by-run execution tablerefine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md— method description for implementation contextidea-stage/IDEA_CANDIDATES.md— compact idea summary (preferred whenCOMPACT: true) (fall back to./IDEA_CANDIDATES.mdif not found)idea-stage/IDEA_REPORT.md— full brainstorm output (fall back to./IDEA_REPORT.mdif not found)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 330 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 219f1d5ee000
experiment-bridge is a skill published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 3,714 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to experiment-bridge, differing in 63 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-ml-data-science
Builds ML, responsible-AI, and multimodal models. Use when doing data science or explaining fairness, privacy, speech, vision-language, or diffusion mechanics.
ai-scaling-laws
Sizes models and token budgets using Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling laws. Use when reasoning about compute-optimal N and D, tokens-per-parameter ratios, or over-training tradeoffs.
content-refinement-agent
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate…
section-writing-agent
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimentallog.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges…
plotting-agent
Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimentallog.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER…
outline-agent
Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimentallog.md, template.tex, conferenceguidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator…