Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add raja21068/AutoResearch --skill paper-writing-benchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/paper-writing-bench)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/paper-writing-bench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/paper-writing-bench/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/paper-writing-bench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/raja21068/autoresearch/paper-writing-bench.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00097 | $0.01306 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00653 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
paper-writing-bench scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to paper-writing-bench — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 134 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PaperWritingBench (§3)
Faithful implementation of the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, §3 and App. C, F.2).
The original benchmark contains 200 papers (100 CVPR 2025 + 100 ICLR 2025). For each paper, the authors reverse-engineer the (I, E) tuple by stripping narrative flow from the original PDF using the three prompts in App. F.2. You can use this skill to reverse-engineer your own benchmark cases from any paper PDF.
What this skill does
Given an existing AI research paper (PDF or markdown extract), produce:
idea.md(Sparse variant) — high-level concept note, no math, no experimental resultsidea.md(Dense variant) — detailed technical proposal with LaTeX equations and variable definitions, but still no experimental resultsexperimental_log.md— exhaustive raw experimental setup, numeric data, and qualitative observations, with all narrative references stripped
These three files form a complete (I, E) input pair for the
paper-orchestra pipeline. You can then run the pipeline and compare its
output to the original paper using paper-autoraters.
Inputs
- A paper PDF or extracted markdown text. The paper uses MinerU (Wang et al., 2024) for PDF→markdown extraction; you (the host agent) should use whatever PDF extractor your environment provides.
- For controlled experiments, you may also extract figures separately (PDFFigures 2.0 in the paper).
Outputs
bench/<paper_id>/idea_sparse.md— Sparse variantbench/<paper_id>/idea_dense.md— Dense variantbench/<paper_id>/experimental_log.md— Experimental log
Workflow
For each paper, run three independent LLM calls using the verbatim prompts below:
1. Sparse idea generation
Load references/sparse-idea-prompt.md. Pass the paper text (or
markdown extract) as {paper_content}. The prompt instructs the model to:
- Stop extracting at empirical verification (no Experiments / Results / Comparisons)
- Use first-person future tense ("We propose to explore...")
- Avoid LaTeX math; describe components by function
- Anonymize authors and titles
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 134 lines · 97 tokens per session scan A c4f90aaae0ba
paper-writing-bench is a skill published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 97 tokens to every session and 1,306 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to paper-writing-bench, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-refinement-agent
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate…
section-writing-agent
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimentallog.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges…
outline-agent
Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimentallog.md, template.tex, conferenceguidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator…
paper-autoraters
Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the…
plotting-agent
Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimentallog.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER…
paper-writing-bench
Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a…