Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rajitsaha/100xprism --skill issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rajitsaha/100xprismWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rajitsaha/100xprism/issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 187 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.02494 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00998 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00499 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue — Investigate & Create Detailed GitHub Issue
Given an observation, bug, or gap: investigate multi-dimensionally, find the root cause, plan the resolution, and create a detailed actionable GitHub issue.
Do NOT ask for permission — investigate thoroughly, then create the issue.
Phase 1 — Codebase Investigation
Understand the problem in full context before forming any opinion.
PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel); cd "$PROJECT_ROOT"
git log --oneline -20
git status
# Detect the stack so later steps don't assume GCP/npm (canonical block — source: _lib/reference.md)
INSTRUCTION_FILE=$(for f in CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md .cursorrules; do [ -f "$PROJECT_ROOT/$f" ] && echo "$PROJECT_ROOT/$f" && break; done)
CLOUD=""
if command -v gcloud >/dev/null 2>&1 && gcloud config get-value project >/dev/null 2>&1; then CLOUD=gcp; fi
[ -z "$CLOUD" ] && grep -rqiE "aws_|amazonaws|::aws" "$PROJECT_ROOT"/terraform "$PROJECT_ROOT"/infra "$PROJECT_ROOT"/cdk.json 2>/dev/null && CLOUD=aws
[ -z "$CLOUD" ] && [ -n "$INSTRUCTION_FILE" ] && grep -qiE "gcloud|Cloud Run|Firebase" "$INSTRUCTION_FILE" && CLOUD=gcp
CI_SYSTEM=""; ls "$PROJECT_ROOT"/.github/workflows/*.y*ml >/dev/null 2>&1 && CI_SYSTEM=github-actions
echo "stack: cloud=${CLOUD:-none} ci=${CI_SYSTEM:-none}"
- Search for all code relevant to the observation (routes, components, services, DB queries, migrations, tests)
- Read the relevant source files — never guess at behavior
- Check recent commits in the affected area:
git log --oneline --since="60 days ago" -- <relevant-paths> - Check for existing related issues (only if
ghis available). Pull titles and bodies, then match on meaning, not just a keyword grep — a dupe often uses different words for the same root cause:
If an existing issue describes the same underlying problem, reference or update it instead of filing a duplicate.command -v gh >/dev/null 2>&1 && gh issue list --state all --limit 100 \ --json number,title,body -q '.[] | "#\(.number) \(.title)\n\(.body)\n---"' 2>/dev/null - Check current test coverage for the affected code paths
- If a production issue and
CLOUD=gcp, check Cloud Run logs (resolve the project from gcloud config — never pass a literal placeholder):
For other providers, read logs the platform-appropriate way (AWS:if [ "$CLOUD" = gcp ]; then PROJECT=$(gcloud config get-value project 2>/dev/null) gcloud logging read "resource.type=cloud_run_revision AND severity>=ERROR" \ --project="$PROJECT" --limit=20 --format="value(textPayload)" 2>/dev/null || true fiaws logs tail; Vercel:vercel logs; or the project's configured log viewer). Skip if not a production issue.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 269 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 71ad6fd18063
issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository rajitsaha/100xprism (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 2,494 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
issue-analysis
Fetch and analyze an issue from a project tracker with all related context. Gathers attachments, media, linked resources, and provides effort estimates. Use when starting work on a ticket, triaging issues, or gathering comprehensive context about a bug report or feature request.
agenttrace-session-audit
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace for cost, tool failures, latency, anomalies, health, diffs, and CI gates.
gh-issues
Use when creating, triaging, or commenting on GitHub issues for the Kilo VS Code extension or JetBrains plugin via gh. Covers issue templates, project board assignment, title conventions, and required gh scopes.
jetbrains-dev
Use when building, running, or debugging the JetBrains plugin — Gradle build/typecheck tasks, sandbox runIde modes and recovery, stopping sandbox runs, dev storage isolation, debug/chat logging, CLI pin modes and pin bumping.
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.