Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rakovi4/continue-framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rakovi4/continue-framework/main/.claude/skills/test-coverage/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rakovi4/continue-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rakovi4/continue-framework/test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rakovi4/continue-framework/test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rakovi4/continue-framework/test-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rakovi4/continue-framework/test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rakovi4/continue-framework/test-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00518 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00207 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00104 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/test-coverage - Run Tests with Coverage Report
Usage
/test-coverage usecase
/test-coverage storage
/test-coverage rest RegisterUserController
/test-coverage usecase --focus # only classes touched in recent git diff
Arguments
First word is the module:
usecase→:usecasestorage,rest,email,scheduling,security→:adapters:{name}domain→ measured through the suites exercising domain codefrontend→ frontend coverage tooling from the active technology profile
Optional second word filters the report to classes matching that name.
Optional --focus restricts the report to changed production files. In staged
lanes, pass the recorded baseline and explicit owned paths, including already
committed changes; use last-commit focus only when no explicit scope was supplied.
Pass report-only mode for every staged lane so the coordinator owns tracking.
Action
Delegate to .claude/agents/coverage-agent.md with module, focus paths/baseline,
and report-only mode. It resolves backend or frontend tooling from the active
technology profile and uses .claude/templates/testing/coverage-commands.md for
scope, report format, gap mapping, and remediation.
Steps:
- Run tests with coverage (stop if tests fail)
- Compute each touched module summary from its coverage report
- List classes with gaps (apply filter/focus if specified)
- Extract uncovered lines/branches, read source to show actual code
- Report results
- In
--focusmode: map gaps to scenarios and classify reachability; return staged-lane findings to the coordinator, otherwise update progress.md for reachable gaps. Flag dead code for refactor.
Agent
.claude/agents/coverage-agent.md— workflow for gap analysis, reachability classification, progress.md updates
Templates
.claude/templates/testing/coverage-commands.md— universal workflow: focus mode, module mapping, report format.claude/tech/{backend}/templates/testing/coverage-commands.md— tool-specific commands: run, parse, extract
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines b8a5fedf2a2a
- 2mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A a378dc18853d
test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository rakovi4/continue-framework (54 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 518 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.