Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills --skill stakeholder-communicationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rampstackco/claude-skills/stakeholder-communication)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rampstackco/claude-skills/stakeholder-communication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rampstackco/claude-skills/stakeholder-communication/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rampstackco/claude-skills/stakeholder-communication"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rampstackco/claude-skills/stakeholder-communication.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.02572 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01029 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00514 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
stakeholder-communication scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- stakeholder-communication — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 361 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Stakeholder Communication
Get the right information to the right people at the right time, in a form they can act on. Stack-agnostic. Applies to any team operating with cross-functional stakeholders.
When to use
- Writing weekly or monthly status updates
- Preparing for an executive review or board update
- Sharing a technical decision with a non-technical audience
- Communicating a delay, miss, or quality problem
- Asking for help, resources, or decisions
- Managing up to a manager or sponsor
- Designing the communication cadence for a project
- Drafting an internal announcement
When NOT to use
- Customer-facing communication (use marketing/support skills)
- Public comms or press (different framework, different stakes)
- Incident communication during an active incident (use
incident-response) - Internal documentation that isn't time-sensitive (use
documentation-strategy) - Specific delivery formats (slide deck design, email tone) - this skill is about content and structure
Required inputs
- The audience (who specifically, what's their context, what do they care about)
- The purpose (inform, decide, escalate, ask, celebrate)
- The substance (what's actually happening)
- The medium (email, doc, meeting, slide, chat)
- Time constraints (when do they need this)
The framework: 5 questions
Before any stakeholder communication, answer:
Question 1: Who is the audience?
Specifically. "Leadership" is too vague. The CFO and the VP of Engineering have different concerns.
For each named audience:
- What do they care about? (revenue, risk, quality, velocity, costs, customers)
- What do they already know? (background you can skip)
- What's their level of detail tolerance? (executives want headlines; ICs want details)
- What action do you want from them? (acknowledgment, decision, help, no action)
Question 2: What's the headline?
If they read only one sentence, what should they take away?
The headline goes first. Always. The narrative supports it; the data confirms it.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 361 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A a3686760ebe7
stakeholder-communication is a skill published in the GitHub repository rampstackco/claude-skills (987 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 2,572 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-creation-walkthrough
Step-by-step guide for creating your own Claude Skills, from deciding whether a skill is the right tool to writing the SKILL.md file, structuring reference material, and making it trigger reliably. Use when you want to package a workflow, framework, or repeated task into a reusable Skill, when an existing skill is not…
mass-ulw
Drives dependency-ordered child work through the native workflow tool, each phase's stages defined up front in one run, with retry/amend/send recovery. Use when the user asks for mass-ulw, a DAG of tasks, or fan-out work where some tasks must wait on others.
crm-data-cleanup
Cleans up CRM data from HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Close, Attio, or any CRM CSV export. Finds duplicate contacts and companies with fuzzy matching (not just exact email), normalizes emails, phones to E.164, names, domains, states, and countries, flags stale, invalid, role, and test records, finds broken…
meeting-intelligence
Analyze meeting transcripts to extract decisions, action items, blockers, sentiment, and generate follow-up emails. Use when user provides meeting notes, transcripts, or recordings and needs structured summaries or action tracking.
multi-agent-client-onboarding
Uses Agent SDK to deploy 3 parallel agents for client onboarding -- workflow auditor, tech stack mapper, and strategy drafter. Real consulting workflow that produces a complete client assessment.
session-handoff
Use when a working session is ending, the context window is nearly full, work needs to pass to a teammate or a fresh session, or the user says "hand this off", "write this up before we lose it", "I'm starting a new session", or "summarize where we are". Produces a handoff document that lets the next session resume…