code-review-checklist

code-review-checklist is a skill for Claude Code from ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas. It costs 23 tokens per session (2,774 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-review-checklist, MIT.

A step-by-step checklist for reviewing code for functionality, security, performance, and maintainability. It starts by clarifying the change's purpose, requirements, affected files, and testing approach.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing pull requests, auditing a codebase, setting team review standards, training developers, or writing review documentation.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance of missing edge cases, logical errors, weak error handling, or quality problems during a review.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it when reviewing pull requests, auditing a codebase, setting team review standards, training developers, or writing review documentation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas --skill code-review-checklist
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review-checklist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review-checklist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas/code-review-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 23 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,774 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 98% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00023 $0.02774
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.01387
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00555
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00277

Measured 11d ago against content hash 49277182cdab, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

98% identical to code-review-checklist — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/code-review-checklist/SKILL.md · 448 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 448 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Checklist

Overview

Provide a systematic checklist for conducting thorough code reviews. This skill helps reviewers ensure code quality, catch bugs, identify security issues, and maintain consistency across the codebase.

When to Use This Skill

  • Use when reviewing pull requests
  • Use when conducting code audits
  • Use when establishing code review standards for a team
  • Use when training new developers on code review practices
  • Use when you want to ensure nothing is missed in reviews
  • Use when creating code review documentation

How It Works

Step 1: Understand the Context

Before reviewing code, I'll help you understand:

  • What problem does this code solve?
  • What are the requirements?
  • What files were changed and why?
  • Are there related issues or tickets?
  • What's the testing strategy?

Step 2: Review Functionality

Check if the code works correctly:

  • Does it solve the stated problem?
  • Are edge cases handled?
  • Is error handling appropriate?
  • Are there any logical errors?
  • Does it match the requirements?

Step 3: Review Code Quality

Assess code maintainability:

  • Is the code readable and clear?
  • Are names descriptive?
  • Is it properly structured?
  • Are functions/methods focused?
  • Is there unnecessary complexity?

Step 4: Review Security

Check for security issues:

  • Are inputs validated?
  • Is sensitive data protected?
  • Are there SQL injection risks?
  • Is authentication/authorization correct?
  • Are dependencies secure?

Step 5: Review Performance

Look for performance issues:

  • Are there unnecessary loops?
  • Is database access optimized?
  • Are there memory leaks?
  • Is caching used appropriately?
  • Are there N+1 query problems?

Step 6: Review Tests

Verify test coverage:

  • Are there tests for new code?
  • Do tests cover edge cases?
  • Are tests meaningful?
  • Do all tests pass?
  • Is test coverage adequate?

Examples

Example 1: Functionality Review Checklist

## Functionality Review

### Requirements
- [ ] Code solves the stated problem
- [ ] All acceptance criteria are met
- [ ] Edge cases are handled
- [ ] Error cases are handled
- [ ] User input is validated

### Logic
- [ ] No logical errors or bugs
- [ ] Conditions are correct (no off-by-one errors)
- [ ] Loops terminate correctly
- [ ] Recursion has proper base cases
- [ ] State management is correct

### Error Handling
- [ ] Errors are caught appropriately
- [ ] Error messages are clear and helpful
- [ ] Errors don't expose sensitive information
- [ ] Failed operations are rolled back
- [ ] Logging is appropriate

### Example Issues to Catch:

**❌ Bad - Missing validation:**
\`\`\`javascript
function createUser(email, password) {
  // No validation!
  return db.users.create({ email, password });
}
\`\`\`

**✅ Good - Proper validation:**
\`\`\`javascript
function createUser(email, password) {
  if (!email || !isValidEmail(email)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid email address');
  }
  if (!password || password.length < 8) {
    throw new Error('Password must be at least 8 characters');
  }
  return db.users.create({ email, password });
}
\`\`\`

Read the full file on GitHub · 448 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 448 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 49277182cdab

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository ratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas (8 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,774 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to code-review-checklist, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.