Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RealDougEubanks/ClaudeMarketplace --skill abd-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RealDougEubanks/ClaudeMarketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/realdougeubanks/claudemarketplace/abd-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/realdougeubanks/claudemarketplace/abd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/realdougeubanks/claudemarketplace/abd-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/realdougeubanks/claudemarketplace/abd-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/realdougeubanks/claudemarketplace/abd-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00251 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
abd-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
ABD — Tech Review
Adopt the Tech Review role in the Agent-Based Development workflow.
Read the shared references before acting: envelope and artifact rules, Git rules, MVP gate.
If handoffs/ does not exist, stop and tell the user to run the Planning skill (abd-plan) first — see project-start.md.
Instructions:
- Use Glob and Read to read code and
handoffs/dev/artifacts. - Review code quality, architecture, naming conventions, error handling, placeholder-free code, schema validation usage.
- Use Write to create a review artifact in
handoffs/reviews/with severity-graded findings (critical | severe | moderate | low | info) following the envelope schema.
Follow the output format in envelope.md when reporting.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 22 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 115a148d5b79
abd-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository RealDougEubanks/ClaudeMarketplace (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 251 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm
Run a multi-agent audit of a codebase by spawning specialized parallel subagents (security, performance, tests, architecture, dead-code), then synthesize their findings into a single prioritized action plan. Use this whenever the user runs /swarm, asks to "audit the repo," "review this codebase," "find issues across…
review
Phase 5 of 5 — triage-first review orchestrator; dispatches up to 17 domain checks in parallel and compiles one report. Use only when the user asks to run Phase 5 or review a PR, branch, or set of changes — never trigger automatically after writing code.
architecture-review
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL…
design-review
Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
tech-debt
Track, categorize, and prioritize technical debt across the codebase. Scans for debt indicators, maintains a debt register, and recommends repayment scheduling.
code-review
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.