Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/redhatinsights/nxtcm-components/monaco-e2e-testingnpx skills add RedHatInsights/nxtcm-components --skill monaco-e2e-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RedHatInsights/nxtcm-componentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhatinsights/nxtcm-components/monaco-e2e-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/redhatinsights/nxtcm-components/monaco-e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/redhatinsights/nxtcm-components/monaco-e2e-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02088 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01044 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00418 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
monaco-e2e-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 334 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Monaco Editor E2E Testing
Use this guide when writing Playwright E2E tests for Monaco editor integration in React applications.
Critical Constraint: Monaco Event System
Monaco's setValue() does NOT trigger onChange events.
This means:
- Programmatically setting editor content will NOT fire validation handlers
- Debounced validation that depends on onChange will NOT run
- E2E tests CANNOT reliably test validation logic
Rule: E2E tests for Monaco should focus on workflow and integration, not validation.
What to Test Where
✅ E2E Tests (Playwright E2E)
Test user workflows and integration:
- Opening/closing the editor
- Navigation between editor and other UI
- Initial content display (generated from form data)
- Editor initialization (Monaco loaded, visible, interactive)
- UI controls (buttons, panels, toggles)
- Modal confirmations (discard changes, etc.)
✅ Component Tests (Playwright CT)
Test validation and editor behavior:
- Validation error display
- Schema violations
- Format errors (YAML syntax, CIDR validation, etc.)
- Error markers in Monaco
- Error banner updates
- Mock Monaco events directly to trigger validation
✅ Unit Tests (Jest)
Test validation logic in isolation:
- Schema validation functions
- Custom format validators
- Error message formatting
- YAML parsing
Exposing Monaco for E2E Testing
Add a global window reference when the editor mounts (development/test mode only):
const handleEditorDidMount: EditorDidMount = useCallback(
(editor, monaco) => {
editorRef.current = editor;
// Expose editor for E2E testing
if (import.meta.env.DEV) {
(window as typeof window & { monacoEditor?: typeof editor }).monacoEditor = editor;
}
// ... rest of editor setup
},
[]
);
Why import.meta.env.DEV?
- Only exposes in development/test builds
- Not included in production bundle
- Works with Vite dev server for E2E tests
Accessing Monaco Content
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 334 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bb89463da652
monaco-e2e-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository RedHatInsights/nxtcm-components (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,088 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
use-agent-browser-for-airi
Test AIRI display-model imports with agent-browser across stage-tamagotchi Electron, stage-web, and stage-pocket mobile web layouts. Use when uploading and verifying contributor-supplied Live2D ZIP, VRM, or MMD ZIP/PMX/PMD files through AIRI's model selector, including onboarding bypass, format-specific import…
verify
Exercise the real app/API/CLI and collect observable evidence; tests alone do not count as end-to-end verification.
solopi-ai
通过 SoloPi 的机器可读 CLI 编译和执行 AI 验证计划,管理签名端侧 ExecuTorch 决策模型、持久设备池、无人值守任务、安卓设备、应用、动作、配置、用例步骤与交互录制、回放及性能历史、动态 Agent、批量与重复执行、性能监控、压力测试和证据。适用于需求/AC 到 Result Judge 三态结论、cloud/on-device 决策切换、模型发布门禁,以及 generation 租约的多设备 CI 执行。.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
local-frontend-check
Smoke-test or verify UI behaviour on the local Jarvis Registry frontend running at http://localhost/gateway. Use for manual regression checks, bug-fix verification, and end-to-end confirmation of specific flows without running the automated test suite.
pr-integration-test
Design, implement, and validate Intelligent Terminal integration tests for a target pull request or regression. Use when asked to add PR integration tests, convert a bug fix into E2E coverage, prove existing behavior still works, map tests to the release checklist, or verify E2E reports mark checklist cases complete.