experiment

experiment is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ResearAI/DeepScientist. It costs 28 tokens per session (2,637 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A workflow for carrying out one measured implementation run after a research idea and a comparison baseline have been accepted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to recover the selected idea and baseline, map the required code changes, run the experiment, and record the result.
Why use it?
It keeps the code change, evaluation method, and result bounded so the evidence can be trusted and compared.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

About the project

DeepScientist is a local research studio that manages the cycle from baseline experiments through research findings and paper-ready outputs. Researchers use it to organize autonomous scientific investigations, review progress, and take control when needed. The catalogue add-ons provide workflows and agent integrations for running research projects with it.

ResearAI/DeepScientist · 3,314 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/researai/deepscientist/experiment
Any agent
npx skills add ResearAI/DeepScientist --skill experiment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ResearAI/DeepScientist

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for experiment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/researai/deepscientist/experiment.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/researai/deepscientist/experiment)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/researai/deepscientist/experiment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/researai/deepscientist/experiment.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,637 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00028 $0.02637
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.01319
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00527
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00264

Measured 5d ago against content hash cf78d994d2cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

experiment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/skills/experiment/SKILL.md · 269 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Experiment

Use this skill for the main evidence-producing runs of the quest. The goal is to turn one selected route into one trustworthy measured result with the smallest valid amount of execution.

Match signals

Use experiment when:

  • a baseline is accepted
  • an idea has been selected
  • the evaluation contract is explicit
  • the quest is ready for implementation and measurement rather than framing, route selection, or writing

Do not use experiment when:

  • the baseline gate is unresolved
  • the idea stage still has unresolved tradeoffs
  • the main need is writing or follow-up analysis rather than a main run
  • the real problem is still route choice, baseline recovery, or open-ended optimization rather than one bounded measured run

One-sentence summary

Turn one selected route into one trustworthy measured result with the smallest valid amount of execution, then record and route from the evidence.

Quick workflow

  • Recover the selected idea, accepted baseline, metric contract, and current workspace before implementation.
  • Keep the selected idea summarized in 1-2 sentences, then write a minimal code-change map before touching broad code.
  • Define the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, research question, research type, research objective, experimental setup, experimental results, experimental analysis, and experimental conclusions as the run matures.
  • Run only the checks needed to maximize valid evidence per unit time and compute.
  • Use equivalence-preserving efficiency upgrades when they preserve baseline comparability; For comparison_ready, verify-local-existing, attach, or import should usually beat full reproduction.
  • If an efficiency change affects baseline comparability, treat it as a real experiment change.
  • Prefer one clean implementation pass and one real run over repeated half-runs when the route is already concrete.
  • Implement according to the current PLAN.md; revise the plan before changing the route.
  • implement according to the current PLAN.md
  • Extra metrics are allowed, but missing required metrics are not.
  • extra metrics are allowed, but missing required metrics are not
  • If a useful non-canonical metric appears, record it as supplementary output rather than replacing the canonical comparator.
  • In algorithm-first work, experiment is the execution surface of optimize, then results return to optimize or decision for frontier review.
  • End with a concise 1-2 sentence outcome summary, evaluation_summary, claim_update, baseline_relation, failure_mode, and next_action.

Read the full file on GitHub · 269 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 269 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A cf78d994d2cb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

experiment is a skill published in the GitHub repository ResearAI/DeepScientist (3,314 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 2,637 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

instrument-data-to-allotrope

Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · 123 tokens

exploratory-data-analysis

Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 83 tokens

matlab

Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 42 tokens

phylogenetics

Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 68 tokens

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

mapping-to-snomed

Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…

maziyarpanahi/openmed · 205 tokens