Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Rezenders/scientific_writing_agent --skill paper-buildgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rezenders/scientific_writing_agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rezenders/scientific_writing_agent/paper-build)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rezenders/scientific_writing_agent/paper-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rezenders/scientific_writing_agent/paper-build/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rezenders/scientific_writing_agent/paper-build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rezenders/scientific_writing_agent/paper-build.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00457 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00183 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
paper-build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Paper Build
Build and validate the manuscript using the current repository Makefile.
Workflow
- Change to
<PROJECT_ROOT>. - Run
make pdf. - Scan build output for fatal LaTeX errors, especially lines beginning with
!. - Report whether the build succeeded.
- If the build fails, stop and report the error details instead of continuing.
- If the build succeeds, run
make lint. - Run
make lint-diff(orpython3 scripts/lint_diff.py) to determine whether anychktexwarnings are new relative to.agents/context/lint-baseline.json. - Report non-suppressed
chktexwarnings grouped by file, and distinguish pre-existing baseline warnings from newly introduced warnings. - Report undefined references and missing citations found in build output.
Commands
cd <PROJECT_ROOT>
make pdf
make lint
make lint-diff
Repository-Specific Expectations
Customize these in .agents/context/paper-model.md for a concrete paper project:
<BUILD_COMMAND>builds<PDF_OR_ARTIFACT_PATH>.<LINT_COMMAND>runs the project's LaTeX or manuscript lint checks.<OPTIONAL_DIFF_LINT_COMMAND>distinguishes newly introduced warnings from any accepted baseline.- Update lint baselines only after intentional cleanup or when the user explicitly asks.
Reporting Requirements
- Build status:
PASSorFAIL - PDF target status:
<PDF_OR_ARTIFACT_PATH> - Fatal LaTeX error details when present
- Undefined references: lines matching
LaTeX Warning: Reference ... undefined - Missing citations: lines matching
LaTeX Warning: Citation ... undefined - Lint status with warnings grouped by file
- Lint-diff status:
NO NEW WARNINGSor list of newly introduced warnings
Constraints
- If the TeX toolchain or
chktexis unavailable, report that explicitly. - Do not claim a clean result if the build failed, if undefined references remain, or if missing citations remain.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -19 lines · -9 tokens per session e327dc0d57e2
- 2mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A fd7ecdd09562
paper-build is a skill published in the GitHub repository Rezenders/scientific_writing_agent (14 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 457 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
paper-build compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| paper-buildRezenders/scientific_writing_agent | Skill | 14 | 17d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code, Codex |
| pydicomK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| nature-paper2wordYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 233 | Codex |
| pptx-postersK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| nature-paper-transYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 68 | Codex |
| extracting-lab-tablesmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 210 | Claude Code |
| paper-compilewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Skill | 19k | 3d ago | MIT | B | 53 | Claude Code |