Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add richfrem/agent-plugins-skills --skill critical-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/richfrem/agent-plugins-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/critical-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/critical-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/critical-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/critical-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/richfrem/agent-plugins-skills/critical-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00464 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00232 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
critical-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to gpt55-critical-auditor — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Purpose
This skill performs a deep, adversarial system audit designed to break:
- runtime enforcement guarantees
- mutation safety assumptions
- eval coverage completeness
- plugin isolation boundaries
This is NOT a compliance review.
This is a failure-seeking audit.
Audit Mandate
You must assume:
- The system is incorrect until proven otherwise
- Enforcement can be bypassed unless proven impossible
- Evals are incomplete
- Plugins will attempt to violate boundaries
- Mutation logic will corrupt state unless isolated
Required Focus Areas
1. Execution Enforcement
- Can HALT be bypassed?
- Are there code paths where violations do not interrupt execution?
- Are exceptions truly global?
2. Mutation Integrity
- Can partial mutations persist?
- Are sandbox boundaries leak-proof?
- Can state escape
temp/sandbox/?
3. Eval Authority
- What behaviors are NOT covered by evals?
- Can mutations exploit blind spots?
- Can regression be reclassified as acceptable?
4. Baseline Integrity
- Can baselines be indirectly manipulated?
- Are diffs actually verified or just declared?
5. Plugin Isolation
- Do any skills:
- chain multiple actions?
- make decisions?
- orchestrate workflows?
6. Orchestration Leakage
- Are there hidden multi-step flows inside skills?
- Are sub-agents behaving like orchestrators?
7. Debt System Exploits
- Can debt accumulate without blocking progress?
- Can agents route around debt enforcement?
Output Requirements
For every issue:
- ID
- Severity (P0/P1/P2)
- Exploit scenario (MANDATORY)
- Exact failure path
- Why enforcement fails
- System impact
- Recommended fix
- Can agent exploit automatically? (YES/NO)
Critical Rule
If you cannot prove a guarantee is enforced:
→ It must be treated as NOT enforced
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 91 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 22dbfda7974b
critical-auditor is a skill published in the GitHub repository richfrem/agent-plugins-skills (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 464 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to gpt55-critical-auditor, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
akirule
Aki's contextual rule router — invoke BEFORE acting whenever the task touches any of - .md/.vue/.css/.tsx/.rs/.sql files; docs, plan, README, CHANGELOG; UI, component, CSS, tailwind; SEO, schema, sitemap; release, version, commit, push, deploy; DB schema, migration; Tauri; i18n, UI copy; pricing, biz; UX review…
akihelp
Introduce the whole Aki Claude Code system — installed skills, the akirule passive rule router (3 tiers), the deep-think passive/active split, and a painpoint-to-prompt table for the situations people actually hit — by reading live installed state, never a hardcoded inventory. Use when the user asks what Aki…
report
Something went wrong or made the work harder — recorded where it belongs, and if it is the skill's own defect, packaged into a file you can send.
akithink
Structured deep-thinking session between agent and human for important decisions — restate the problem, excavate the goal chain to the ultimate goal, first-principles decomposition (facts/constraints/assumptions), mandatory critique (steelman, inversion, pre-mortem), then converge into a decision record. For big /…
audit
Health and opportunities: what burns tokens, what stalls, what drifted, and what the ledger counts as waste.
quick
One job, no company: three questions, one or two agents, build then review.