Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to RipeMangoBox/BITE. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RipeMangoBox/BITE/main/.claude/skills/papers-audit-metadata-consistency/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RipeMangoBox/BITEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ripemangobox/bite/papers-audit-metadata-consistency)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ripemangobox/bite/papers-audit-metadata-consistency"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ripemangobox/bite/papers-audit-metadata-consistency.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00480 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00240 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
papers-audit-metadata-consistency scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Metadata Consistency Audit
What this skill does
Runs one unified audit entry for step5 quality governance:
- checks
obsidian-vault/paper_list.csvand legacy list/log entries when present; - checks
obsidian-vault/analysis/**/*.mdanalysis notes; - checks cross-layer consistency between log/list and analysis notes;
- outputs
obsidian-vault/batches/reports/quality_report_*.md(optionally.json).
Coverage
This skill covers structural and metadata hygiene only.
- title / venue / year consistency
- link completeness (
paper_link,project_link/github_link,pdf_ref) - duplicate paper detection in txt logs
- analysis note structure anomalies (missing frontmatter keys, missing semantic analysis sections)
- unmatched records (
only-in-txt,only-in-md)
Current limits
- does not evaluate whether conclusions are sufficiently supported by evidence
- does not score citation quality in idea notes or share notes
- does not audit completeness of comparison tables or downstream summaries
- does not detect stale analyses that should be refreshed
- broader semantic-layer governance belongs to a future knowledge-hygiene / evidence-governance extension
Run
From the repository root:
python3 .claude/skills/papers-audit-metadata-consistency/scripts/audit_metadata_consistency.py
Optional JSON output:
python3 .claude/skills/papers-audit-metadata-consistency/scripts/audit_metadata_consistency.py --json
Output
obsidian-vault/batches/reports/quality_report_<YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM>.md- optional
obsidian-vault/batches/reports/quality_report_<YYYY-MM-DD_HHMM>.json
When to use
- after collect/download/analyze batches
- before rebuilding indexes
- periodic KB quality checks for open-source readiness
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 61 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A c3a05e027a74
papers-audit-metadata-consistency is a skill published in the GitHub repository RipeMangoBox/BITE (61 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 480 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
results-report
A workflow for turning completed experiment analyses into a structured research report with findings, limitations, failures, and next steps.
results-analysis
This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze experimental results", "run strict statistical analysis", "compare model performance", "generate scientific figures", "check significance", "do ablation analysis", or mentions interpreting experiment data with rigorous statistics and visualization. It focuses on…
nature-data
Prepare, audit, or revise Nature-ready Data Availability statements, data repository plans, dataset citations, and FAIR metadata checklists for manuscripts. Use when the user asks about Nature data availability, research data sharing, repository selection, accession numbers, restricted or sensitive data, source data…
nature-response
Draft, audit, or revise point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions. Use when the user provides reviewer comments, editor decision letters, revision notes, response drafts, or asks how to respond to major/minor revision requests, rebuttal letters, response to reviewers, peer-review…
paper-self-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review paper quality", "check paper completeness", "validate paper structure", "self-review before submission", "audit claims", "check overclaiming", "verify whether results support claims", or mentions systematic paper quality checking. Provides comprehensive quality…
post-acceptance
This skill should be used when the user asks to "prepare conference presentation", "create presentation slides", "design poster", "make academic poster", "write promotion content", "create Twitter thread", or mentions post-acceptance conference preparation. Provides comprehensive workflow for presentation, poster, and…