Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjwalters/kicad-toolsnpx agentmods add skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-builder-prWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-builder-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-builder-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-builder-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-builder-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-builder-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.13064 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.05226 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.02613 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01306 |
Grade A, and why
loom-builder-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Builder: PR Creation and Quality
This document covers PR creation, test output handling, and quality requirements for the Builder role. For the core builder workflow, see builder.md.
Contents
- Pre-Implementation Review: Check Recent Main Changes
- Test Output: Truncate for Token Efficiency
- Acceptance Criteria Verification: REQUIRED Before PR Creation
- Rollout check (host-move PRs)
- Test-First Discipline (TDD line, required in PR body)
- PR Titles: Conventional Commit Style Required
- Commit Messages: Same Rules as PR Titles
- Creating Pull Requests: Label and Auto-Close Requirements
- Handling Pre-existing Lint/Build Failures
- Raising Concerns
Pre-Implementation Review: Check Recent Main Changes
CRITICAL: Before implementing, review recent changes to main to avoid conflicts with recent architectural decisions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines 1e6987766786
- yesterday Changed 7754f9d15bc1
- 3d ago Changed 3ff441176037
- 4d ago Changed · -1 lines 9983b42874a1
- 5d ago Changed · -3 lines 1a4e923b4e88
- 6d ago Changed · -4 lines bdd28bcd3fb2
- 8d ago Changed · -10 lines e717efc4ebb6
- 10d ago Changed · -3 lines e4a5993ac2bb
- 11d ago Changed · -6 lines 3e55a32e13e8
- 12d ago First seen · 1,197 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 47f73416cc01
loom-builder-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository rjwalters/kicad-tools (70 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 13,064 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflow-patterns
Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.
nw-quality-framework
Quality gates - 11 commit readiness gates, build/test protocol, validation checkpoints, and quality metrics.
cmux-testing
Choose scoped cmux verification, add behavioral tests, and validate Swift test targets and wiring. Use when adding tests or deciding what local/CI evidence a change needs.
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.
resolve-issues
Resolves GitHub issues using isolated worktrees and test-driven development, then delegates PR creation to /github:create-pr so the quality gate and the /github:review-pr loop always run. This skill should be used when the user asks to "resolve an issue", "fix issue.
gh-issue
Fetch GitHub issue, create branch, plan and implement with TDD, then open PR.