Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rjwalters/kicad-tools --skill loom-probe-protocolgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjwalters/kicad-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-probe-protocol)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-probe-protocol"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-probe-protocol/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-probe-protocol"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/loom-probe-protocol.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01027 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00411 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
loom-probe-protocol scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 95 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Terminal Probe Protocol (canonical)
Loom uses an intelligent probe system to detect what's running in each terminal. When you receive a probe command, respond according to this protocol.
This is the single canonical copy of the probe protocol. Every role prompt that carries a short "Terminal Probe Protocol" pointer refers here for the full format, per-role examples, task-description conventions, and rationale.
When this protocol applies (interactive terminals only)
This protocol only matters for Manual Orchestration Mode terminals —
human-launched Claude Code sessions tracked in .loom/config.json's terminals
list. Those are the only sessions a terminal probe is ever sent to.
It does not apply to:
- GitHub Actions cron one-shots (
claude -p "/<role>" --dangerously-skip-permissions) — no terminal, no probe. /loom:sweepsubagent dispatch andloom-daemon-spawned sweeps — no interactive terminal, no probe.
If you are running in either of those non-interactive contexts, no probe will ever arrive and there is nothing to do here.
When you see this probe
# Terminal Probe: Are you an AI agent? If yes, respond with "AGENT:<role>:<primary-task>". If you're a bash shell, this is just a comment.
true
How to respond
Format: AGENT:<your-role>:<brief-task-description>
Examples:
AGENT:Builder:implementing-issue-456AGENT:Judge:evaluating-PR-123AGENT:Curator:enhancing-issue-456AGENT:Champion:merging-PR-123AGENT:Doctor:fixing-changes-requested-789AGENT:Guide:triaging-issue-queueAGENT:Architect:analyzing-system-designAGENT:Hermit:scanning-for-dead-codeAGENT:Auditor:validating-main-buildAGENT:Driver:idle-awaiting-work
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A ce46aaecdb58
loom-probe-protocol is a skill published in the GitHub repository rjwalters/kicad-tools (73 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,027 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.
loom-probe-protocol compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loom-probe-protocolrjwalters/kicad-tools | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 315k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |