Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rjwalters/kicad-tools --skill repo-followupsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjwalters/kicad-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-followups)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-followups"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-followups/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-followups"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-followups.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.10173 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.04069 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.02035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01017 |
Grade A, and why
repo-followups scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 717 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex form of the
/repo:followupscommand. Other commands appear as$repo-<verb>skills. Helper scripts and.claude/paths below are relative to the repository root and exist when the Claude Code surface is installed alongside this one.
$repo-followups — File Session Follow-Ups
Mine the current working session for follow-on work that was surfaced but not done — bugs found-but-not-fixed, deferred TODOs, documentation gaps, and limitations discovered in an upstream tool while using it — then file each as an issue in the right repo (this repo, or an upstream tool repo like Loom / Anvil / Repo Skills / kicad-tools).
Unlike every other /repo:* command, which scans repo / git / filesystem
state, this one mines the conversation: the deferred work and discovered
bugs that only exist in the session's context. Filing is outward-facing — for
upstream targets it writes into other people's repos, usually public ones —
so this command is in the same "always confirm first" class as release,
remote, and update-tools, never the auto-apply behavior of the hygiene
commands. Confirmation is the default and only mode; there is no --ask flag
because there is nothing to opt into.
Mining a private session and publishing into a public repo is a visibility boundary crossing, so every cross-repo candidate is scrubbed at authoring time against [[scrub]]'s detection classes before it is ever proposed — see step 3b.
Usage
$repo-followups # Review this session, propose issues, confirm, then file
$repo-followups --dry-run # Propose only — show what would be filed, file nothing
$repo-followups --repo loom # Restrict to follow-ups targeting one tool repo
$repo-followups --here # Only this repo; skip all upstream tool repos
Steps
1. Mine the session for candidates
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed · +10 lines 135b4aada32b
- 8d ago First seen · 707 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A a3aebd716205
repo-followups is a skill published in the GitHub repository rjwalters/kicad-tools (73 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 10,173 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-01.
repo-followups compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| repo-followupsrjwalters/kicad-tools | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 315k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |