Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rjwalters/kicad-tools --skill repo-readmegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjwalters/kicad-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-readme)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-readme/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rjwalters/kicad-tools/repo-readme.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01230 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00492 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
repo-readme scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex form of the
/repo:readmecommand. Other commands appear as$repo-<verb>skills. Helper scripts and.claude/paths below are relative to the repository root and exist when the Claude Code surface is installed alongside this one.
$repo-readme — README Check
Validate that READMEs accurately describe the directories they live in. Catches stale file trees, incorrect descriptions, and missing READMEs in significant directories.
This is the README-structure layer of [[docs]]. Use it directly when that's all you want to check; use [[docs]] for the full documentation sweep.
Usage
$repo-readme # Scan all READMEs in repo
$repo-readme packages/core # Scope to one subtree
$repo-readme docs/README.md # Check a specific README
$repo-readme --ask # Review findings and confirm before applying
By default, apply the safe, reversible fixes as you find them — updating stale
listings, correcting wrong annotations — and report each change (they're all
git-reversible). Run with --ask to review first: present the findings and
confirm before touching anything. Writing a brand-new README is a judgment
call, so it's always proposed, never written unattended, in either mode.
What It Checks
1. File Tree Accuracy
If a README contains an ASCII file tree (... block with ├── or └──),
compare it against the actual directory listing:
- Files/dirs listed in README but missing on disk
- Files/dirs on disk but not listed in README
- Descriptions that are factually wrong (e.g., "gitignored" when it's tracked)
2. Missing READMEs
GitHub renders a directory's README.md right below its file listing, so a
README at each level a person browses to makes the repo read as documented
instead of a bare file dump. Flag directories that a human would actually
navigate to in the web UI and that lack one, scaled by how significant the
directory is:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 113 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A e280bd6b899a
repo-readme is a skill published in the GitHub repository rjwalters/kicad-tools (73 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,230 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-01.
repo-readme compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| repo-readmerjwalters/kicad-tools | Skill | 73 | yesterday | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code, Codex |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 315k | 5d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |