RPent: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/docs-check/SKILL.md

docs-check is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from RLinf/RPent. It costs 40 tokens per session (755 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A documentation and prose review tool for RPent. It checks written material, comments, translations, prompts, and visible messages against the implementation for accurate commands, settings, examples, terminology, and behavior.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when writing or reviewing guides, API documentation, README files, examples, translations, comments, prompts, or user-facing messages.
Why use it?
Documentation can be wrong even when the software builds successfully. This helps catch outdated instructions, mismatched English and Chinese pages, and claims that the code does not support.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is RLinf/RPent's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on RPent itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything RPent configures →

About the project

RPent is an open framework for building embodied agents, software systems that perceive and act in the physical world while combining reasoning, memory, execution, and adaptation. It is intended for embodied-intelligence researchers working on physical tasks and related evaluations.

RLinf/RPent · 1,640 stars · on GitHub · rpent.readthedocs.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to RLinf/RPent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RLinf/RPent/main/.agents/skills/docs-check/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RLinf/RPent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for docs-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlinf/rpent/docs-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlinf/rpent/docs-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlinf/rpent/docs-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlinf/rpent/docs-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for docs-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlinf/rpent/docs-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlinf/rpent/docs-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 40 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 755 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00040 $0.00755
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00302
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00151
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00076

Measured 29d ago against content hash 6b605dbc19a5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

docs-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/docs-check/SKILL.md · 72 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Check documentation and prose

Follow AGENTS.md and the documentation requirements in CONTRIBUTING.md. Establish the changed files and intended audience, then read their owning implementation and nearby examples. For documentation structure, terminology, and layout, follow docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md.

For restructuring, record the pre-edit revision and content destinations. Compare commands, dependency options, defaults, output descriptions, numeric tables and their conditions, and media references after the final edit. Keep the leaderboard and incomplete integration entries unless a requested change explicitly covers them. Check simulator overview fields and shared section order against the style guide, and inspect Chinese inline markup in generated HTML; a warning-free build does not establish correct rendering.

Check meaning and coverage

  • Verify commands, flags, configuration keys, defaults, paths, API names, and capability claims against the relevant revision and actual consumers. A successful build does not prove these claims. For public behavior changes, identify the affected guides, API docstrings, examples, and README entries.
  • Read the paired pages under docs/source-en/ and docs/source-zh/ when both cover the feature, even if only one changed. Preserve equivalent behavior, commands, prerequisites, limitations, and reported results in both languages.
  • Translate meaning into natural Chinese using nearby terminology. Preserve identifiers, commands, and proper names; choose context-appropriate technical terms instead of literal substitutions. Do not force identical sentence structure across languages.
  • Describe current behavior and useful non-obvious constraints. Remove review exchanges, authoring notes, redundant implementation narration, and obsolete comparisons while retaining factual qualifications and necessary rationale. Historical explanations belong in migration or change records when needed.
  • Match neighboring pages for headings, links, code blocks, and examples. Keep comments near their owning contract and avoid repeating the same rule across several files.
  • Inspect prompts and tool descriptions as model inputs: check tool names, placeholders, actual rendered context, conflicting rules, and unnecessary repetition. Preserve behavioral instructions and distinguish prose cleanup from changes that require runtime evidence.

Read the full file on GitHub · 72 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 29d ago Changed · +10 lines 6b605dbc19a5
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 554a20fd8139
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 534ff9d72ba7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

docs-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository RLinf/RPent (1,640 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 755 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-17.