Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot --skill recallgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/recall)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/recall"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/recall/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/recall"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robinnorberg/oh-my-copilot/recall.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00562 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00225 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
recall scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to recall — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Recall
Reconstruct where the work stands from what was persisted, in order of trust:
- Durable state:
.omg/notepad.md,.omg/project-memory.json, and the per-mode state in both active layouts (ralph/autopilot/team) — the session-scoped.omg/state/sessions/{id}/and the legacy.omg/state/<mode>-state.jsonfallback for runs persisted before a session id existed (docs/HOOKS.md keeps both live) — what was in flight, what iteration, what was blocked. - Ledgers and trails: under OMC's state root — the verification ledger
(
state/verification-ledger.tsv, by default the checkout's.omg/state/;OMC_STATE_DIRor a parent.omc-workspacemoves the root) and everystate/decision-trail-*.tsvfile (what was decided and why); enumerate the glob before reconstructing. - The transcript tail: the last N messages of this session — what was said, what was promised.
- The shared record: the repo's standing rules (AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md) name project-specific places to check before declaring anything "never recorded".
Report
- Where it stands: one paragraph, from the state files.
- What was last proven: from the ledger, with SHAs.
- Open threads: promised-but-not-done, from the transcript and trails.
- The next action: one concrete step, named — then take it if the user asked for continuation, propose it if they asked for status.
Rules
- Report from the artifacts, not from memory; memory is what the artifacts are for.
- A thread with no artifact behind it is reported as "mentioned but not persisted", never reconstructed from vibes.
- Human rulings encountered in the trails keep their original wording
(
whyskill epistemics).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 53 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A c0c0495248c8
recall is a skill published in the GitHub repository RobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 562 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to recall, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
recall compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| recallRobinNorberg/oh-my-copilot | Skill | 5 | yesterday | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| engineer-brainHrithik-Gavankar/brainstack | Skill | 24 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 133 | Claude Code |
| brief-meadamlinscott/claude-skills | Skill | 4 | 16d ago | MIT | A | 145 | Claude Code |
| sessionxiaobei930/cc-best | Skill | 50 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| vaultfloomhq/moto | Skill | 32 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code, Codex |
| Cortexdanielmiessler/LifeOS | Skill | 20k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 184 | Claude Code |
| Profiledanielmiessler/LifeOS | Skill | 20k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 108 | Claude Code, Codex |