Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add RobotFlow-Labs/skills-repo --skill analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobotFlow-Labs/skills-repoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/robotflow-labs/skills-repo/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robotflow-labs/skills-repo/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robotflow-labs/skills-repo/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/robotflow-labs/skills-repo/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/robotflow-labs/skills-repo/analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.01468 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00734 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00294 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00147 |
Grade A, and why
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 187 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A d456f2ebcd5f
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection is a skill published in the GitHub repository RobotFlow-Labs/skills-repo (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,468 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Use when performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
A security-testing guide for Objection, a tool that lets testers inspect and interact with an iOS app while it is running. It uses Frida and can work with jailbroken devices or specially prepared app packages.
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Performs runtime mobile security exploration of iOS applications using Objection, a Frida-powered toolkit that enables security testers to interact with app internals without jailbreaking. Use when assessing iOS app security posture, bypassing client-side protections, dumping keychain items, inspecting filesystem…
analyzing-ios-app-security-with-objection
Runtime iOS app security testing with Objection (Frida): inspect keychain and filesystem data, explore app internals at runtime, and validate/bypass client-side protections during authorized mobile assessments.