Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rockielab/rockie-claudenpx agentmods add skills/rockielab/rockie-claude/queue-refillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockielab/rockie-claude/queue-refill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockielab/rockie-claude/queue-refill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rockielab/rockie-claude/queue-refill.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.00877 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
queue-refill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- queue-refill — 100% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/queue-refill — auto-refill the experiment queue
Keeps the autonomous agent's forward-looking work queue full. This is the "Prioritization Specialist" pattern from arXiv 2604.13018 adapted to our harness.
When to run
- Scheduled: every N hours (via
/scheduleor/loop), so the queue is always ≥ target when a GPU frees up. - Reactive: when
queue.py refill-neededexits non-zero. - Manual: user asks "what should we try next?" or "refill the queue".
What the skill does
-
Read recent context from workflow.db:
- Last 20
[LEARN]rules (learningstable) - All active
dead_endsfor this project best_so_farview (per metric)calibration_scorecard— which hypotheses were over/under-predictedexperimentstable — recent nodes, stages, failure_class distribution
- Last 20
-
Read STATE.md to understand current research direction.
-
Brainstorm 3–5 new queue items. Each item must:
- Be a single-sentence testable hypothesis
- Include a predicted metric delta (forced quantitative prior)
- Not overlap an active
dead_endsdirection (query before proposing) - Prefer building on best-so-far (extend the working path) unless there's evidence the path is saturating
- Match the current
stage.py getsuggestion (draft → tune → creative → ablation)
-
Call
queue.py addfor each. Example:python3 .claude/scripts/queue.py add \\ --hypothesis "Matrix token init with log-normal std 0.02 reduces warmup loss vs normal(0, 0.02)" \\ --metric val_loss --predicted-delta -0.04 \\ --priority 2 --minutes 45 --stage creative -
Report what was added in a single message to the user.
Constraints
- Never re-propose an active dead-end direction. If the FTS5 search
on
dead_endsmatches what you're about to add, skip it. - Always include a predicted_delta. Missing priors break hypothesis calibration.
- Priority scale: 1 = highest (block the queue if nothing else), 5 = nice-to-have. Default 3.
- Estimated_minutes: be honest. Under-estimating torches the budget controller. Over-estimating means the scheduler never picks it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 81 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A ee99eda9afcf
queue-refill is a skill published in the GitHub repository Rockielab/rockie-claude (21 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 877 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoresearch
Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for execution, supports…
release-doi
A release procedure for research repositories that publish versions with a DOI, a permanent identifier for scholarly work, through Zenodo.
content-refinement-agent
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate…
section-writing-agent
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimentallog.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges…
paper-autoraters
Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the…
plotting-agent
Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimentallog.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER…