Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro --skill ultra-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rocky2431/ultra-builder-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro/ultra-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro/ultra-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro/ultra-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro/ultra-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro/ultra-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.04250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.02125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00850 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00425 |
Grade A, and why
ultra-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 440 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/ultra-review - Ultra Review System
Orchestrates parallel code review using specialized agents. All findings written to JSON files to prevent context window pollution.
Workflow Tracking (MANDATORY)
On command start, create tasks for each major step using TaskCreate:
| Step | Subject | activeForm |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Setup & Scope Detection | Detecting diff scope... |
| 2 | Agent Selection | Selecting review agents... |
| 3 | Background Execution | Running review agents... |
| 4 | Wait & Coordinate | Waiting for agent results... |
| 5 | Report to User | Generating review report... |
Before each step: TaskUpdate → status: "in_progress"
After each step: TaskUpdate → status: "completed"
On context recovery: TaskList → resume from last incomplete step
Usage
/ultra-review # Full review (smart skip based on diff content)
/ultra-review all # Force ALL 6 agents, no auto-skip (pre-merge gate)
/ultra-review quick # Quick review (review-code only)
/ultra-review security # Security focus (review-code + review-errors)
/ultra-review tests # Test quality focus (review-tests only)
/ultra-review recheck # Re-check only P0/P1 files from last session
/ultra-review delta # Review only changes since last review session
/ultra-review <agents...> # Custom: e.g., /ultra-review tests errors types
Scope Options (combinable with any mode)
/ultra-review --pr 123 # Review PR #123 diff (base...head)
/ultra-review --range main..HEAD # Review specific commit range
/ultra-review --range abc123 # Review single commit
/ultra-review security --pr 42 # Security review scoped to PR #42
Orchestration Flow
Phase 1: Setup & Scope Detection
# 1. Determine session context
BRANCH = git branch --show-current # e.g., "feat/task-3-auth"
ITER = count existing sessions matching this branch + 1 # iteration number
# 2. Create session directory with full context
SESSION_ID = "<YYYYMMDD-HHmmss>-<branch>-iter<N>"
# e.g., "20260214-103000-feat-task-3-auth-iter2"
SESSION_PATH = ".ultra/reviews/{SESSION_ID}/"
mkdir -p SESSION_PATH
# 3. Update session index (placeholder — verdict filled in Phase 5)
# Append entry to .ultra/reviews/index.json with verdict="pending"
# See Session Index below for full schema
# 4. Cleanup (see Lifecycle Management below)
# 5. Detect diff scope (priority order)
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 440 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A d54a26ed2a9e
ultra-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository rocky2431/ultra-builder-pro (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 4,250 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…