Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rockyflux/yq-workflow --skill yq-code-gengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rockyflux/yq-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/yq-code-gen)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/yq-code-gen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/yq-code-gen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/yq-code-gen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rockyflux/yq-workflow/yq-code-gen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00783 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00392 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
yq-code-gen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
YQ Code Generation
Overview
把已经明确的需求、接口、数据和边界落成可运行、可验证、可维护的实现。
Core principle: 先对齐边界和验证方式，再写最贴近现有代码库的实现。
When to Use
- 用户要实现功能、补模块、落地设计或补齐骨架
- 上游需求和方案已经基本稳定
- 需要在现有代码库模式内新增行为
- 重点是交付代码，不是讨论方案
Route Elsewhere
- 范围或验收标准还不清楚：转
yq-req-analysis - 方案和边界还没定：转
yq-system-design、yq-api-design、yq-db-design - 重点是重构旧代码：转
yq-code-refactor - 重点是定位问题：转
yq-debug
Process
- 汇总上游约束、假设和禁止事项。
- 对照现有代码库找到最接近的实现模式。
- 先立边界和接口，再填业务逻辑、校验和错误处理。
- 为测试、日志和后续评审保留稳定观察点。
- 标明未覆盖风险和后续补测点。
Output
# Code Generation Result
## Scope Implemented
## Files or Modules Added / Changed
## Key Decisions
## Validation and Error Handling
## Follow-up Tests Needed
## Recommended Next Step
Related Skills
- 上游通常来自
yq-req-analysis、yq-system-design、yq-api-design、yq-db-design - 下游通常接
yq-test-gen、yq-code-review、yq-security-scan - 编码前后的验证纪律可参考
superpowers:test-driven-development
Recommended Next Step
- 默认交给
yq-test-gen，先把关键行为和回归风险锁住 - 如果需要先做人审视角的风险收敛，可接
yq-code-review - 如果改动涉及认证、授权、敏感数据或外部输入，可并行补
yq-security-scan
Common Mistakes
- 直接开写，没有先收口边界
- 只补 happy path，没有错误语义和状态校验
- 生成脱离仓库风格的孤岛式代码
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 95 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A ffe9deff1fea
yq-code-gen is a skill published in the GitHub repository rockyflux/yq-workflow (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 783 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…