Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add roedyrustam/vibes-plug --skill scalability-clean-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/roedyrustam/vibes-plugWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/scalability-clean-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/scalability-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/scalability-clean-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/scalability-clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roedyrustam/vibes-plug/scalability-clean-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.02312 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00462 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
scalability-clean-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scalability & Clean Code (2026 Edition)
English
Orchestration & Integration
Connects and orchestrates with relevant domain skills like brainstorming, zero-to-prod-orchestrator, and project-context-mapper to ensure cohesive execution.
Description
Software architecture guidelines for writing clean, scalable, and maintainable code. Covers SOLID principles, DRY/YAGNI/KISS, Clean Architecture layers, Vertical Slice Architecture (the modern alternative to layered architecture), Domain-Driven Design (DDD) patterns, and practical refactoring techniques.
Trigger Conditions
- Refactoring a codebase that has become hard to understand or modify.
- Designing the architecture for a new feature or service.
- Identifying and eliminating code smells (God Classes, Feature Envy, Long Methods).
- Deciding between Layered Architecture vs Vertical Slice Architecture.
- Applying SOLID principles to a specific code problem.
The SOLID Principles (With Modern Context)
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
A module/class/function should have one reason to change. In 2026 React/Node.js context:
- Bad: A React component that fetches data, transforms it, and renders UI.
- Good: Separate
useUserQuery()hook (fetch),transformUser()util (transform),UserCardcomponent (render).
Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
Open for extension, closed for modification. Use composition and strategy pattern:
// Bad: modify existing code every time a new payment provider is added
function processPayment(type: 'stripe' | 'polar' | 'paypal', amount: number) {
if (type === 'stripe') { /* ... */ }
else if (type === 'polar') { /* ... */ }
}
// Good: extend by adding new providers, not modifying existing code
interface PaymentProvider {
charge(amount: number): Promise<Receipt>;
}
class StripeProvider implements PaymentProvider { ... }
class PolarProvider implements PaymentProvider { ... }
function processPayment(provider: PaymentProvider, amount: number) {
return provider.charge(amount);
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed e3184d0a6e07
- 8d ago First seen · 236 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 89204aa92b5d
scalability-clean-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository roedyrustam/vibes-plug (53 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,312 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
update-dependencies
Upgrade project dependencies with breaking change research for major version updates. Use when the user asks to "update dependencies", "upgrade packages", "upgrade dependencies", "update deps", "upgrade deps", "update npm deps", "update Swift packages", "cargo update", "go get updates", "bundle update", or "pip…
review-plan
Review a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants feedback on a plan.
finalize
Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to "finalize implementation", "finalize changes", "wrap up implementation", "finish up", "ready to commit", or "run QA workflow".
ai-cold-outreach
When the user wants to build an AI-powered outreach system, write cold emails, improve deliverability, or scale personalized outreach. Also use when the user mentions 'cold email,' 'cold outreach,' 'outreach automation,' 'Instantly,' 'Smartlead,' 'Clay,' 'email sequences,' 'deliverability,' 'personalization at scale,'…
tlc-plan
Turns decided work — a PRD, design doc, RFC, or thread — into tasks a builder can act on without guessing. Finds slices that each prove something, grounds them in the code, and writes intent, observable criteria with concrete values, the boundary, what the change disturbs, and only the decisions that are hard to…
the-judge
Evidence-first pull request judge that reviews a PR and posts one consolidated GitHub review with inline comments via the gh CLI. Runs the repo's own deterministic checks first, researches current official docs before any claim about external libraries or APIs, then reviews correctness, security, structural quality…