arbitration-interim-relief-drafter

arbitration-interim-relief-drafter is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills. It costs 209 tokens per session (1,623 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A drafting aid for choosing the right temporary protection in an arbitration dispute: an emergency arbitrator, the arbitration panel, or a court. It then prepares the application for that route, including Indian court remedies under Sections 9 and 17.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess arbitration agreements, urgency, evidence, tribunal status, asset locations, and related proceedings, then draft an interim-relief application.
Why use it?
It helps avoid seeking urgent protection from the wrong decision-maker or asking for a remedy without enough evidence, jurisdiction, or detail about the threatened harm.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the rohas-legal-ai plugin — 149 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess arbitration agreements, urgency, evidence, tribunal status, asset locations, and related proceedings, then draft an interim-relief application.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill arbitration-interim-relief-drafter
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install rohas-legal-ai, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 149 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for arbitration-interim-relief-drafter

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for arbitration-interim-relief-drafter

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 209 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,623 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 64
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00209 $0.01623
Opus 5 $0.00105 $0.00812
Sonnet 5 $0.00042 $0.00325
Haiku 4.5 $0.00021 $0.00162

Measured 12d ago against content hash 80e5ba435c21, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

arbitration-interim-relief-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rohas-legal-ai/skills/arbitration-interim-relief-drafter/SKILL.md · 67 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Arbitration Interim Relief Drafter

I am using the Arbitration Interim Relief Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: chooses the route — emergency arbitrator, tribunal, or court (India) — and drafts the application. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Purpose

Select the correct interim-protection route — emergency arbitrator, tribunal, or court — without treating urgency as a substitute for jurisdiction, evidence, or a remedy tailored to the threatened harm, then draft the application for the route chosen.

Required inputs

Obtain the arbitration agreement, contract, amendments, seat, governing law, institution and applicable rule version (if any), status of invocation and tribunal constitution, the precise relief sought, threatened act, urgency, date of likely harm, evidence supporting the right asserted and the harm, asset or property location, respondent's conduct, prior notices, undertakings requested, related proceedings, existing orders, and service information.

Ask whether a request for arbitration has been or will be filed simultaneously, what harm will occur before an ordinary tribunal can act, and where an order would need recognition or practical compliance.

Treat the arbitration agreement, forum, tribunal-constitution status, factual basis, and requested protective measure as blocking. Do not draft an ex parte or without-notice case without a complete account of material facts, including facts adverse to the applicant.

Step 1 — Choose the route

Before drafting anything, determine and state which route applies:

  1. Emergency arbitrator — tribunal not yet constituted, the applicable institutional rules include an emergency mechanism, and the deal is seated/administered under rules that support it.
  2. Tribunal interim measures — tribunal already constituted (India: section 17). Once constituted, address explicitly whether the tribunal-ordered remedy would be inefficacious before seeking court intervention — do not rely on urgency alone to justify bypassing it.
  3. Court interim measures — pre-constitution protection where no emergency-arbitrator mechanism applies or is adequate, post-award protection, or a seat/system where court relief is the only or the more effective route (India: section 9).

Read the full file on GitHub · 67 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 67 lines · 209 tokens per session scan A 80e5ba435c21

Subscribe to this mod's changes

arbitration-interim-relief-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 209 tokens to every session and 1,623 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens