Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill arbitration-notice-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-notice-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-notice-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-notice-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-notice-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/arbitration-notice-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 54 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.00858 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00429 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
arbitration-notice-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Arbitration Notice Drafter
I am using the Arbitration Notice Drafter skill from Rohas Legal AI: notice invoking arbitration, with the disputes properly framed. Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Purpose
Create an unequivocal, procedurally compliant commencement document that identifies the arbitration agreement and disputes, preserves the claimant's position, and triggers the correct appointment or institutional process.
Required inputs
Obtain:
- the signed contract and arbitration agreement, including amendments;
- pre-arbitration escalation, notices, cure, and service provisions;
- the parties' exact legal names, addresses, capacities, and representatives;
- a dated factual account, breaches alleged, amounts currently known, and relief sought;
- the seat, institution, applicable rules, governing law, and tribunal composition;
- prior demand, termination, settlement, or reservation-of-rights correspondence; and
- the relevant limitation dates and the date by which notice must be served.
Treat the arbitration agreement, identity of the parties, dispute to be invoked, and service route as blocking inputs. Use conspicuous placeholders for unknown quantum or relief details rather than inventing them.
Method
- Determine what document is required: contractual notice of dispute, notice invoking arbitration, institutional request for arbitration, arbitrator nomination, or a combined document permitted by the applicable framework. Do not treat one as another without confirming.
- Verify completion or waiver of mandatory escalation steps. Build a short compliance chronology and identify any step that remains contested.
- Identify the arbitration agreement verbatim, the contract containing it, and the parties said to be bound. Explain separately any joinder, assignment, succession, or non-signatory basis.
- Frame each dispute by transaction, obligation, breach, key date, and resulting relief. State the present case clearly without pleading every evidentiary detail or foreclosing additional claims revealed by disclosure.
- State the invocation unequivocally. Specify the proposed tribunal constitution, nomination or appointment request, response deadline, and default route exactly as supported by the clause and current rules.
- State relief by category: declarations, payment, performance, injunction, interest, and costs. Label figures provisional where the evidence is incomplete and reserve amendment only to the extent the applicable procedure permits.
- Verify required filing content, fees, copies, portal steps, and service under the current official institutional rules or applicable law. Keep filing requirements outside the notice body when they belong in a submission checklist.
- Prepare a service record listing recipient, capacity, contractual address, channel, time zone, transmission evidence, and deemed-receipt rule.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 57 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A fe68c5a97fb6
arbitration-notice-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 858 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…