Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill cirp-timeline-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/cirp-timeline-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/cirp-timeline-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/cirp-timeline-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/cirp-timeline-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/cirp-timeline-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 10 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.00730 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
cirp-timeline-checker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CIRP Timeline Checker
I am using the CIRP Timeline Checker skill from Rohas Legal AI: CIRP steps and statutory timelines for a matter (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.
Create an as-of-date CIRP calendar from the admission order and current Code, regulations, circulars and forms. Never reuse an old model calendar without checking amendments.
Required inputs
- Admission order, insolvency commencement date and date received
- IRP appointment and confirmation, RP appointment and authorisations
- Public announcement, claim, CoC constitution and meeting records
- Current process day, stays, exclusions, extensions and NCLT orders
- Valuation, information memorandum, EOI, RFRP and plan records
- IBBI and NCLT filings, forms, fee receipts and delay explanations
- Pending applications, appeals and proposed next actions
Method
- Freeze the legal version. Record the audit date and retrieve the current IBC, CIRP Regulations, rules, circulars, prescribed forms and applicable tribunal directions. Check the effect of the 2026 amendments.
- Set time zero. Distinguish insolvency commencement, order communication, appointment, publication and actual-completion dates. Apply the legally required counting convention and holiday rule.
- Build the obligation register. Map each duty to the NCLT, IRP, RP, CoC, authorised representative, creditor, valuer, resolution applicant or other owner.
- Sequence formation. Check public announcement, management handover, claim collation, CoC constitution, report or certification, first meeting and RP appointment milestones.
- Sequence information and investigations. Check custody, books, bank and asset controls, valuations, information memorandum, transaction audit, avoidance applications and statutory reporting.
- Sequence plan process. Check EOI publication, provisional and final lists, objections, confidentiality and eligibility materials, RFRP and evaluation matrix, plan receipt, revisions, CoC consideration and voting.
- Sequence adjudication and close. Check plan application, approvals, regulatory conditions, liquidation decision, process expiry and handover or implementation filings.
- Reconcile extensions and exclusions. Tie every claimed extension or excluded period to the correct provision and order. Keep elapsed calendar days, counted CIRP days and disputed days separate.
- Audit compliance. Compare required, planned and actual dates; identify missed forms, fees, meetings, disclosures and approvals; state cure and consequence without backdating.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 45 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 51e5d255d547
cirp-timeline-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…