related-party-analyst

related-party-analyst is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills. It costs 118 tokens per session (1,031 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An India-focused legal analysis for deciding whether people, companies, relationships, or transactions count as related parties. It maps the approvals, disclosures, registers, and reporting duties that may follow.

In plain words
What is it for?
Assessing related-party transactions, including ownership, control, family links, pricing, conflicts, audit committee and board approvals, shareholder votes, abstentions, and disclosures.
Why use it?
It prevents a company from relying on only one definition and missing connected relationships or required approvals. It also shows which facts and records are needed for a defensible conclusion.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the rohas-legal-ai plugin — 149 skills shipped together

Good fit Assessing related-party transactions, including ownership, control, family links, pricing, conflicts, audit committee and board approvals, shareholder votes, abstentions, and disclosures.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills --skill related-party-analyst
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install rohas-legal-ai, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 149 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for related-party-analyst

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for related-party-analyst

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills/related-party-analyst.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 118 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,031 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 55
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00118 $0.01031
Opus 5 $0.00059 $0.00515
Sonnet 5 $0.00024 $0.00206
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00103

Measured 9d ago against content hash 4287f26233d8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

related-party-analyst scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/rohas-legal-ai/skills/related-party-analyst/SKILL.md · 57 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

I am using the Related Party Analyst skill from Rohas Legal AI: identifies related party transactions and the approvals required (India). Say this sentence, verbatim, before anything else in your response.

Purpose

Build a complete relationship and transaction analysis across company law, listed-entity regulation, accounting standards, governance documents, and policy instead of treating a single statutory definition as the whole answer.

Required inputs

Obtain:

  • the company type, listing status, security type, group structure, subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, and applicable policies;
  • directors, key managerial personnel, promoters, shareholders, beneficial owners, relatives, control, influence, offices, and relevant historical relationships;
  • counterparty ownership and management information;
  • transaction type, value, term, pricing, aggregation period, amendments, recurring nature, and connected transactions;
  • ordinary-course rationale, arm's-length evidence, benchmarking, tender or pricing process, and conflicts; and
  • existing audit committee, board, shareholder approvals, abstentions, disclosures, registers, and filings.

Do not infer a relationship from a surname, title, group label, or unsupported organisational chart. Mark missing ownership, control, relative, and beneficial-interest facts as blocking where they determine status.

Method

  1. Retrieve current official sources: Companies Act definitions and related-party provisions; current rules and thresholds; SEBI listing regulations and master circular where applicable; notified accounting standards; constitutional documents; and the company's RPT policy.
  2. Build a relationship map for both directions. Record person or entity, connecting fact, source, applicable definition, relevant period, and conclusion. Check indirect, beneficial, control, common-management, promoter-group, subsidiary, associate, and relative connections.
  3. Classify each arrangement or transfer of resources, services, obligations, property, office, underwriting, guarantee, loan, lease, cost allocation, secondment, or other benefit under every applicable regime. Do not rely only on the contract's label.
  4. Aggregate connected or repeated transactions using the correct period, entity perimeter, and rule. Show calculations, amendments, currency conversion, taxes, and whether value is gross, net, annual, or lifetime.
  5. Analyse exemptions and conditions separately under each regime. Test ordinary course and arm's length as distinct questions using business practice, comparables, process, terms, margins, credit, security, and non-price benefits.
  6. Build the approval sequence: management process, audit committee, board, shareholder or member, listed-subsidiary or holding-company review, prior or omnibus approval, modification approval, voting exclusions, quorum, and interested participation.
  7. Identify disclosure and record duties: agenda papers, notices and explanatory statements, board report, register, financial statements, stock-exchange disclosure, website, policy, periodic reporting, and minutes.
  8. For an unapproved or changed transaction, assess ratification, voidability, indemnity, penalties, recovery, disclosure correction, governance escalation, and whether performance should pause. Verify current time limits and decision-makers.
  9. Separate legal compliance from fairness and value leakage. A technically approved transaction may still require governance, minority, fiduciary, accounting, tax, or fraud review.
  10. Preserve an evidence pack: declarations, organisation chart, ownership records, valuation or benchmarks, quotations, approvals, abstentions, contract, invoices, disclosures, and monitoring data.

Read the full file on GitHub · 57 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 57 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 4287f26233d8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

related-party-analyst is a skill published in the GitHub repository rohasnagpal/legal-ai-skills (88 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 1,031 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens