Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rome-os/rome. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rome-os/rome/main/.claude/skills/loop-reconcile/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rome-os/romeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rome-os/rome/loop-reconcile)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rome-os/rome/loop-reconcile"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rome-os/rome/loop-reconcile/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rome-os/rome/loop-reconcile"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rome-os/rome/loop-reconcile.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 11 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00546 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00273 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
loop-reconcile scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Loop: reconcile
Goal end-state: every deliverable chunk the run can scope exists as issues, awaiting ready-for-agent, and one report explains whatever it could not scope.
This is the autonomous half of the reconciliation loop. When launched from a session, run it in a background agent. It runs headless: never ask the user a question mid-run. Every ambiguity resolves to a report, never to something plausible. Every report reads standalone on GitHub and never depends on chat context.
All work state lives in the GitHub repository itself: issues, labels, and milestones. No project board. Every issue this skill files carries two labels: loop-reconcile, the mark that the loop owns it, and a scope label loop:<doc-stem> naming its source doc — loop:people for docs/northstars/people.md. A report is an issue too, and it carries loop-complete or loop-needs-discussion on top of those two. If a label is missing from the repository, create it.
Args: an ideal-state doc under docs/northstars/, and optionally a repository milestone.
- Given a milestone, reconcile against the milestone description. First check that the doc still backs every milestone statement: if one contradicts the doc, or the doc no longer asks for it at all, file a
loop-needs-discussionreport and stop. The doc wins on intent, and a milestone that fell behind it needs a session, not work. - Given no milestone, reconcile against the doc's Statements section and file issues attached to no milestone.
- Only the Statements list has authority. The rest of the doc is illustration.
Inputs and precedence
| Source | Role | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Ideal-state doc | What should be | Wins on intent |
| Codebase | What is | Wins on facts |
| Issue tracker | What is in flight | None — it gates and remembers |
- The tracker never influences what to scope. It only gates whether to scope.
- Do not read PR or git history to guess intent. If a gap looks like a deliberate move away from the doc, scope it anyway. The human withholds
ready-for-agentand fixes the doc. - Concurrency belongs to the driver. Assume this run is alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines · -3 tokens per session 1dced13da78f
- 1mo ago First seen · 64 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A b0f29fbfc1c5
loop-reconcile is a skill published in the GitHub repository rome-os/rome (871 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,364 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pm-assistant
Product operations assistant strategy contract. PM short answers and deep analysis should be evidence-grounded and should separate facts from hypotheses. Model calls, hooks, queueing, cancellation, notifications, and staged task execution stay in Rust.
stale-sweep
Sweep the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo for issues and PRs with no real activity in N days (default 60), sort each by whose silence it is (the author's, ours, or nobody's), and draft the nudge or close comment. Use whenever a maintainer asks for a stale sweep, backlog cleanup, or an SLO check, e.g. "stale sweep", "find…
linear-tickets
Create or update high-quality Linear tickets while preserving the originating report, diagnostic links, attachments, and reporter/requester attribution. Read this whenever someone asks to create, recreate, or update a Linear issue.
company-employee
The protocol every employee of a PenguinHarness organization follows — read the handbook first, act on [orgtrigger] work runs, schedule tickets from the desk session and do the work in ticket sessions, block instead of idling, ask the board in the all-hands channel before anything heavy, costly, irreversible or…
company-ceo
Run a PenguinHarness organization as its CEO — turn the mission into a ticket tree, hire HR and finance first, partition the shared workspace, schedule the calendar, open a channel per stream, review tickets and report to the board in the all-hands channel.
company-hr
Run HR for a PenguinHarness organization — guarantee every employee has an enabled calendar event, hire and offboard employees (channels included), evaluate and improve them (with the default-rsi-toolkit plugin's agent-optimization skill), and keep the handbook's role conventions current.