debugging

debugging is a skill for Claude Code from romiluz13/cc10x. It costs 49 tokens per session (2,728 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A debugging method that requires a reproducible feedback loop before forming a theory, finding the underlying cause before changing code, and checking the possible effects afterward.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate bugs with tests, HTTP checks, command-output comparisons, browser scripts, trace replays, small test harnesses, fuzz checks, or comparisons between code versions.
Why use it?
It helps prevent guesswork and fixes that hide the original problem while creating new ones elsewhere.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the cc10x plugin — 22 skills, 14 agents, 10 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to investigate bugs with tests, HTTP checks, command-output comparisons, browser scripts, trace replays, small test harnesses, fuzz checks, or comparisons between code versions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add romiluz13/cc10x --skill debugging
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/romiluz13/cc10x

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cc10x, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 22 skills, 14 agents, 10 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for debugging

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for debugging

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/romiluz13/cc10x/debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 49 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,728 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00049 $0.02728
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.01091
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00546
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00273

Measured 9d ago against content hash 05cc9c98ef48, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

debugging scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

2. `curl`/HTTP request with asserted response
plugins/cc10x/skills/debugging/SKILL.md · 188 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Debugging

Feedback Loop FIRST: No hypothesis without a repro loop. No fix without root cause. No fix without blast radius scan.

Reference Files

  • references/investigation-hygiene.md — investigation discipline, evidence handling
  • references/root-cause-playbooks.md — scenario-specific debugging playbooks

Feedback Loop FIRST (Before Any Hypothesis)

A hypothesis without a repro loop is a guess. Before H1, build a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable signal that turns red on the bug.

Construction Ladder (try in rank order, stop at first that works — ordered by loop tightness: earlier rungs are faster and more deterministic)

  1. Failing automated test (unit/integration) — best: lives at a seam, reusable as RED
  2. curl/HTTP request with asserted response
  3. CLI snapshot diff (run command, diff stdout/stderr/exit)
  4. Headless browser script (real DOM/runtime crash)
  5. Trace replay (recorded request/log/event re-run)
  6. Throwaway harness (tiny script calling the suspect function)
  7. Property/fuzz check (when failing input is unknown)
  8. git bisect run (regression with existing test)
  9. Differential old-vs-new (last-good vs HEAD behavior diff)
  10. Human-in-the-loop (LAST resort: scripted manual steps)

Tighten the loop — treat it as a product. Once you have a loop, keep tightening:

  • Faster? Cache setup, skip unrelated init, narrow the test scope — sub-second beats sub-minute.
  • Sharper signal? Assert the exact failing fact, not a noisy superset — never just "didn't crash".
  • More deterministic? Pin time, seed RNG, isolate filesystem, freeze network — same input → same red, no drift. A 30-second flaky loop is barely better than none; a 2-second deterministic one is a debugging superpower.

Red-capable completion criteria — the loop is done when you can name one command (a script path, a test invocation, a curl) that you have already run at least once (paste the invocation and its output), and it is:

  • Red-capable — drives the actual bug code path and asserts the user's exact symptom (can go red on this bug, green once fixed). Not "runs without erroring".
  • Deterministic — same verdict every run (flaky bugs: a pinned, high reproduction rate).
  • Fast — seconds, not minutes.
  • Agent-runnable — you can run it unattended. No red-capable command, no hypothesis phase. If you catch yourself reading code to build a theory before this command exists, STOP.

Read the full file on GitHub · 188 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago Changed · -3 tokens per session 05cc9c98ef48
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 1e32fe960246
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 187 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A acda1cbfb648

Subscribe to this mod's changes

debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository romiluz13/cc10x (164 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,728 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

issue-analyze

GitHub Issue and PR review thread deep analysis with Codex blind verdict. Use when: analyzing issue root cause, classifying problems, investigation planning, triaging PR review comments for actionability. Not for: fixing bugs (use bug-fix), code exploration (use code-explore). Output: classified analysis + verdict…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 73 tokens

code-explore

Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 51 tokens

debug

Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop. Use when: unknown bugs, script errors, silent failures, troubleshooting. Not for: known bugs (use bug-fix), GitHub issue analysis (use issue-analyze), code understanding (use code-explore). Output: debug report with probe journal + root cause + fix.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 67 tokens

code-investigate

Dual-perspective code investigation. Use when: deep code analysis needing both Claude and Codex perspectives. Not for: quick exploration (use code-explore), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: integrated findings from dual analysis.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 52 tokens

git-investigate

Git history investigation. Use when: tracking code changes, finding where bugs were introduced, root cause analysis. Not for: code exploration (use code-explore), issue analysis (use issue-analyze). Output: history trace + root cause report.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 53 tokens

simplify

Wrap-up refactoring — simplify code, eliminate duplication, preserve behavior.

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 16 tokens