Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/simplifynpx skills add sd0xdev/sd0x-harness --skill simplifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness/simplify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00380 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Simplification
Trigger
- Keywords: simplify, clean up code, remove duplication, simplify code
When NOT to Use
- New feature development (use
/feature-dev) - Document refactoring (use
/doc-refactor) - Full multi-target refactoring (use
/refactor)
Agent Dispatch
Primary: Code Simplification
Agent({
description: "Simplify code, eliminate duplication, preserve behavior",
subagent_type: "code-simplifier",
prompt: `Simplify the code at: $ARGUMENTS
Follow the task steps and constraints defined in this skill.`
})
Secondary: Refactoring Risk Review
After simplification, dispatch risk assessment:
Agent({
description: "Review refactoring risk and verify behavior preservation",
subagent_type: "refactor-reviewer",
prompt: `Review the refactoring changes just applied.
Check behavior preservation, dependency impact, test coverage, and rollback risk.`
})
Task
For $ARGUMENTS:
- Run tests first (establish baseline)
- Refactor
- Dead code removal
- Extract duplicates (3+ repeats)
- Simplify nesting (> 3 levels)
- Run tests again (confirm nothing broken)
Output
## Refactoring Summary
- [file:line] <change>
## Test Results
✅/❌
## Next Steps
- <suggestions>
Constraints
- ❌ Do not change business logic
- ❌ Do not add new features
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 76 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 9562bed1330a
simplify is a skill published in the GitHub repository sd0xdev/sd0x-harness (188 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 380 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cc10x-router
THE ONLY ENTRY POINT FOR CC10X. Activate this skill for build, debug, review, and plan requests. Use when the user asks to implement, fix, review, plan, test, refactor, or continue code work. Trigger keywords: build, implement, create, write, add, review, audit, debug, fix, error, bug, broken, plan, design, architect…
building
Implementation skill for writing production code with TDD. Covers the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle, false-RED detection, vertical slicing, scope escalation, test process discipline, and code generation patterns. Loaded by component-builder and bug-investigator.
diff-driven-docs
Use when a BUILD phase completes, a commit is staged, or a PR is about to be created, and the diff has not yet been reflected in documentation. Also use when the user says "update docs", "sync docs", "document this", or asks whether documentation is up to date.
exploration
Two-mode exploration skill: (1) design dialogue — turn rough ideas into validated designs through collaborative interview before planning; (2) spike — throwaway code answering ONE design question, deleted or absorbed, never shipped. Router invokes mode via dispatch context.
memory-and-handoff
Two-mode skill: (1) session memory — load/persist durable workflow state under .cc10x/ (activeContext, patterns, progress) so context survives compaction; (2) handoff package — portable, secrets-redacted export for a coworker, different tool, or fresh non-cc10x session.
plan-review-gate
Use after saving a non-trivial plan or decision RFC when a fail-closed feasibility, completeness, and alignment review must block execution.