implement

A coding workflow that turns an agreed implementation plan into working code and tests, one small step at a time. It follows the plan instead of designing a new approach.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after planning when you need to implement a feature, fix, or other planned change with tested code. It does not create the plan or open a pull request.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of half-finished changes and keeps the build and existing tests passing as work progresses. It also surfaces missing or conflicting instructions before coding.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ronaknnathani/relay/implement
Any agent
npx skills add ronaknnathani/relay --skill implement
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronaknnathani/relay

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 67 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,238 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00067 $0.01238
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00619
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00248
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00124

Measured 2d ago against content hash 348f01cd8a87, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/implement/SKILL.md · 75 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implement

Turn an implementation plan into working, tested code, one thin slice at a time, keeping the build and existing tests green at every step. The bar: at any moment you could stop and the system is committable — nothing half-built, nothing red. This phase consumes the artifact from plan; it does not design the approach and does not open a PR. Decisions in the plan are settled — follow them; if one is wrong or missing, stop and surface it rather than quietly inventing a different design.

Process

  1. Load the plan and review it critically. Read it end to end before touching code. If a task is ambiguous, a step is missing, or the approach looks wrong, raise it now — don't paper over a gap mid-implementation. Turn the plan's tasks into an ordered checklist of slices.
  2. Load coding guidance. Read the repo's AGENTS.md when present, then read global guidance from ~/AGENTS.md or ~/.config/agents/AGENTS.md when present. Repo guidance takes precedence over global guidance. Treat these files as implementation constraints for scope, style, tests, errors, comments, and workflow; if a plan conflicts with them, stop and surface the conflict before coding.
  3. Learn the repo's own commands. Read the Makefile, package.json scripts, or CI config to find the real build, typecheck, and test commands. Use those exact commands — never assume a toolchain the repo doesn't use.
  4. Pick the smallest complete slice. A slice is the smallest change that is independently testable and leaves the system green — one task from the plan, often smaller. Do not start work on the default branch (main/master) without explicit consent.
  5. Tracer-bullet TDD — one test ↔ one cycle. Write a single failing test for the slice's next behavior, watch it fail (red), write the minimum code to pass it (green), then refactor if needed. Never write all the tests up front, and never refactor while a test is red — get to green first. For a bug, use the Prove-It pattern: first write the reproduction test that fails because of the bug, then fix the code so it passes.
  6. Verify the slice. Typecheck and run the targeted test files; confirm the slice's new test passes and no existing test regressed. The slice isn't done until the system is green again.
  7. Commit the green slice. Commit a coherent, working increment (follow the repo's commit conventions). Keep the commit to this slice — don't fold in unrelated changes.
  8. Next slice. Repeat 4–7 until every task in the plan is done. Hold scope: implement the plan, not adjacent improvements you notice along the way (note them for later).
  9. Final verification. Run the full build and test suite once. This is implement's own green self-check, not the formal quality gate — validate independently runs the repo's full ordered gates and owns the authoritative go/no-go. Report what was built and which verifications passed. Stop here — implementation is complete; a separate workflow handles review and the PR.

Read the full file on GitHub · 75 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 75 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 348f01cd8a87

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronaknnathani/relay (3 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,238 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

winui-ui-testing

Automated UI testing for Windows desktop apps — generate a batch test script with the winapp ui UI Automation harness, run all tests in one pass, read results. Covers element assertions, interactions, value checking (TextBox, ComboBox, ToggleSwitch), keyboard shortcuts and typing (send-keys), hover, drag-and-drop…

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 122 tokens

pr-review

Multi-dimensional review of a PR or feature branch in microsoft/win-dev-skills. Activate on "review my PR / changes / branch", "vet before pushing", "PR review", "is this ready to merge". Fans out parallel sub-agents over skill content, the skill-vs-tool boundary (solution hierarchy), tool correctness…

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 98 tokens

winui-design

Use when designing, reviewing, or fixing WinUI 3: sample and control discovery with winapp find-ui, layout planning, control choice, Fluent Design alignment, Light/Dark/High Contrast theming, typography, spacing, brushes, accessibility, and XAML data-binding design. Load before authoring new XAML, reviewing UI PRs…

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 119 tokens

winui-dev-workflow

Build and run workflow for WinUI 3 apps with WinApp CLI 0.6+ — project creation with winapp new, project-mode winapp run, BuildAndRun.ps1 analyzer integration, crash diagnosis, and prerequisites. Use when creating, building, running, or fixing build errors in a WinUI 3 project.

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 73 tokens

winui-packaging

MSIX packaging, code signing, and distribution for WinUI 3 apps — build for release, certificate generation (winapp cert generate), certificate trust, code signing (winapp sign), self-contained deployment, CI/CD with GitHub Actions, and Microsoft Store submission. Use when preparing for release, creating MSIX…

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 86 tokens

winui-session-report

Analyze the current or a recent agent session (GitHub Copilot CLI or Claude Code) and generate a diagnostic report. Use only when the user explicitly asks for session feedback, agent debugging, or a review of what happened during a build session. Do not inspect session data automatically.

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 61 tokens