Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ronmkr/PromptBook --skill react-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/react-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/react-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/react-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/react-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ronmkr/promptbook/react-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.03155 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.01262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00631 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00315 |
Grade A, and why
react-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to react-testing — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 424 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
React Testing
Comprehensive React testing patterns for behavior-focused component tests, custom hook tests, accessibility assertions, and network-level mocking.
When to Activate
- Writing tests for React components, custom hooks, or pages
- Adding test coverage to legacy untested components
- Migrating from Enzyme or class-component-era patterns to React Testing Library
- Setting up Vitest or Jest for a new React project
- Mocking HTTP requests in tests
- Asserting accessibility violations
- Deciding which tests belong in RTL vs Playwright Component Testing vs full E2E
Core Principle
Test what the user sees and does, not implementation details.
A test should:
- Render the component with the same providers it has in production
- Interact with it via accessible queries (role, label) and
userEvent - Assert visible output and observable side effects (callback fired, request sent)
A test should NOT:
- Inspect component state, props passed to children, or which hooks were called
- Mock React itself or framework hooks
- Assert on the number of renders or DOM structure beyond what affects users
Library Choice
| Runner | When | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Vitest | Vite, Remix, modern setups | Faster, native ESM, Jest-compatible API |
| Jest | Next.js, CRA, established repos | Default for many React projects |
| Playwright Component Testing | Real browser engine needed | Use when JSDOM lacks the required feature |
| Cypress Component Testing | Real browser, Cypress already in use | Alternative to Playwright CT |
Pick one. Do not run RTL + Vitest AND Playwright CT in the same repo unless you have a clear lane separation.
Query Priority
React Testing Library exposes queries in three tiers — use top-down:
- Accessible to everyone:
getByRole,getByLabelText,getByPlaceholderText,getByText,getByDisplayValue - Semantic:
getByAltText,getByTitle - Test IDs (escape hatch):
getByTestId
// Best
screen.getByRole("button", { name: /save/i });
// OK for inputs
screen.getByLabelText("Email");
// Last resort
screen.getByTestId("save-btn");
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 424 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 5c74a1f3bda3
react-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 3,155 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to react-testing, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
storybook-testing
Storybook 10 testing patterns with Vitest integration, ESM-only distribution, CSF3 typesafe factories, play() interaction tests, Chromatic TurboSnap visual regression, module automocking, accessibility addon testing, and autodocs generation. Use when writing component stories, setting up visual regression testing…
browser-qa
Testing web apps through a real browser: reconnaissance before acting, selector discovery, state capture, console errors and screenshot evidence. Use on a web surface end to end, or to reproduce a front-end bug.
knowledge-engineering-quality-and-delivery-real-api-qualification-and-e2e
A guide to tests that call real AI providers and verify complete user flows across the CLI, web interface, terminals, and ACP hosts.
knowledge-engineering-quality-and-delivery-unit-integration-and-shared-test-harnesses
A testing guide for the CLI and web interfaces, covering unit, integration, end-to-end, and real-process test setup with shared fixtures and cleanup.
webapp-testing
Browser-based UI verification using Playwright. Page Object Model, selector best practices, visual regression, network interception, and MCP integration. Trigger: When writing E2E tests, verifying UI changes, or setting up Playwright.
react-test-engineer
Expert guidance for testing React applications using React Testing Library and Vitest. Focuses on user-centric testing, accessibility, and best practices for unit and integration tests to ensure robust and maintainable code.