ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill react-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/affaan-m/ecc/react-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/affaan-m/ecc/react-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/affaan-m/ecc/react-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/affaan-m/ecc/react-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/affaan-m/ecc/react-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 246 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.03154 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.01262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00631 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00315 |
Grade A, and why
react-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- react-testing — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- react-testing — 98% identical, 2 lines differ
- react-testing — 91% identical, 5 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 424 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
React Testing
Comprehensive React testing patterns for behavior-focused component tests, custom hook tests, accessibility assertions, and network-level mocking.
When to Activate
- Writing tests for React components, custom hooks, or pages
- Adding test coverage to legacy untested components
- Migrating from Enzyme or class-component-era patterns to React Testing Library
- Setting up Vitest or Jest for a new React project
- Mocking HTTP requests in tests
- Asserting accessibility violations
- Deciding which tests belong in RTL vs Playwright Component Testing vs full E2E
Core Principle
Test what the user sees and does, not implementation details.
A test should:
- Render the component with the same providers it has in production
- Interact with it via accessible queries (role, label) and
userEvent - Assert visible output and observable side effects (callback fired, request sent)
A test should NOT:
- Inspect component state, props passed to children, or which hooks were called
- Mock React itself or framework hooks
- Assert on the number of renders or DOM structure beyond what affects users
Library Choice
| Runner | When | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Vitest | Vite, Remix, modern setups | Faster, native ESM, Jest-compatible API |
| Jest | Next.js, CRA, established repos | Default for many React projects |
| Playwright Component Testing | Real browser engine needed | Use when JSDOM lacks the required feature |
| Cypress Component Testing | Real browser, Cypress already in use | Alternative to Playwright CT |
Pick one. Do not run RTL + Vitest AND Playwright CT in the same repo unless you have a clear lane separation.
Query Priority
React Testing Library exposes queries in three tiers — use top-down:
- Accessible to everyone:
getByRole,getByLabelText,getByPlaceholderText,getByText,getByDisplayValue - Semantic:
getByAltText,getByTitle - Test IDs (escape hatch):
getByTestId
// Best
screen.getByRole("button", { name: /save/i });
// OK for inputs
screen.getByLabelText("Email");
// Last resort
screen.getByTestId("save-btn");
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 424 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 82ecdce94f7f
react-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (285,716 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 3,154 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
evaluating-llms-harness
Evaluates LLMs across 60+ academic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use when benchmarking model quality, comparing models, reporting academic results, or tracking training progress. Industry standard used by EleutherAI, HuggingFace, and major labs. Supports HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
test-driven-development
TDD: enforce RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, tests before code.
dogfood
Exploratory QA of web apps: find bugs, evidence, reports.
verify-and-stop
Prove existing work meets acceptance conditions without expanding scope. Use for validation-only tasks, completion checks, focused gate runs, and last-mile proof.
darwinian-evolver
Evolve prompts/regex/SQL/code with Imbue's evolution loop.