Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add roodlicht/accans-sec-skills --skill container-hardeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/roodlicht/accans-sec-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/roodlicht/accans-sec-skills/container-hardening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roodlicht/accans-sec-skills/container-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roodlicht/accans-sec-skills/container-hardening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/roodlicht/accans-sec-skills/container-hardening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/roodlicht/accans-sec-skills/container-hardening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.03116 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00623 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00312 |
Grade B, and why
container-hardening scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootlowPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
- A request like "review our Dockerfile", "migrate to distroless", "why does our container run as root", "trivy scan triage", "sign images with cosign". Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
- **Apt/apk install cleanup.** `apt-get install --no-install-recommends` plus `rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*` in the same RUN. Otherwise package lists stay in the layer. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 203 lines · 54 tokens per session scan B cf2b62b5e7f8
container-hardening is a skill published in the GitHub repository roodlicht/accans-sec-skills (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 3,116 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (asks for root, recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Blue Team Defense & Hardening
System hardening, detection engineering, security baseline monitoring, patch management, defense-in-depth architecture, and security posture improvement.
container-security
Container and Kubernetes security assessment — image vulnerability scanning, SBOM diff analysis, K8s cluster auditing, RBAC privilege mapping, NetworkPolicy review, container escape testing, and runtime monitoring (Falco/Tetragon). Use when scanning Docker/OCI images, auditing K8s clusters, reviewing Dockerfiles…
cloud-workload-protection
../../../cloud-infra/cloud-workload-protection/SKILL.md.
container-image-scan
../../../cloud-infra/container-image-scan/SKILL.md.
auditing-kubernetes-cluster-rbac
Auditing Kubernetes cluster RBAC configurations to identify overly permissive roles, wildcard permissions, dangerous ClusterRoleBindings, service account abuse, and privilege escalation paths using kubectl, rbac-tool, KubiScan, and Kubeaudit.
dockerfile-scan
Scan a Dockerfile for insecure build patterns — running as root, unpinned or :latest base images, ADD from remote URLs, piping curl/wget into a shell, hardcoded secrets in ENV/ARG, world-writable chmod 777, and sudo usage. Use when the user asks to "review my Dockerfile", "is this container image secure", "lint my…