Comet is a resumable workflow and skill platform for coding tasks, covering requirements work as well as skill creation, evaluation, and release. It supports separate Native and Classic workflows and can coordinate implementation and verification across isolated Git worktrees. The catalogue contains skills and instructions that implement Comet-related workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rpamis/comet --skill comet-github-issue-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpamis/cometWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/comet-github-issue-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00524 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
comet-github-issue-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Comet GitHub Issue 分诊
先读取 ../comet-github/references/maintainer-contract.md。除非用户明确授权 GitHub 或代码变更，否则保持只读。
收集当前证据
- 阅读完整 Issue 正文、评论、标签、作者、时间、关联 PR 和此前的分诊记录。
- 按领域概念搜索已有 Issue，而不只是复用报告者的原文措辞。识别重复、被替代的 Issue 和已经实现的行为。
- 检查当前源码、配置、安装路径、生成资产和相关测试，以实际仓库契约作为判断依据。
- Bug 信息充分时复现最小有效路径。环境或凭证问题需要区分本地设置和产品行为。
不要仅因描述听起来合理就认定存在缺陷。报告可能有效、夸大、过期，或由本地安装/配置不一致造成。
分类结果
选择一个主要分类：
confirmed defect：当前行为违反用户可见行为或仓库契约，且证据能定位路径；likely defect：证据较强，但仍缺少复现或决定性边界；configuration/install issue：产品行为正确，或本地安装已过期/配置错误；duplicate/already implemented：行为或 Issue 已在其他位置存在；insufficient information：需要补充具体步骤、版本、日志、平台或项目状态；feature request：请求的是新能力，而不是回归问题。
报告与下一步
返回分类和置信度、检查过的证据、相关代码/Runtime 路径、已确认和未知的内容，以及建议动作：补充信息、本地修复、创建聚焦 follow-up、关联已有 PR，或按重复/已实现处理。
不得自动关闭、加标签、评论或创建 follow-up Issue。确实需要新 Issue 时，用户确认范围后再交给 comet-github-idea-to-issue 起草。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 313ce93c4516
comet-github-issue-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpamis/comet (3,255 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 524 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
issue-analyze
GitHub Issue and PR review thread deep analysis with Codex blind verdict. Use when: analyzing issue root cause, classifying problems, investigation planning, triaging PR review comments for actionability. Not for: fixing bugs (use bug-fix), code exploration (use code-explore). Output: classified analysis + verdict…
code-explore
Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.
debug
Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop. Use when: unknown bugs, script errors, silent failures, troubleshooting. Not for: known bugs (use bug-fix), GitHub issue analysis (use issue-analyze), code understanding (use code-explore). Output: debug report with probe journal + root cause + fix.
code-investigate
Dual-perspective code investigation. Use when: deep code analysis needing both Claude and Codex perspectives. Not for: quick exploration (use code-explore), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: integrated findings from dual analysis.
git-investigate
Git history investigation. Use when: tracking code changes, finding where bugs were introduced, root cause analysis. Not for: code exploration (use code-explore), issue analysis (use issue-analyze). Output: history trace + root cause report.
simplify
Wrap-up refactoring — simplify code, eliminate duplication, preserve behavior.