Comet is a resumable workflow and skill platform for coding tasks, covering requirements work as well as skill creation, evaluation, and release. It supports separate Native and Classic workflows and can coordinate implementation and verification across isolated Git worktrees. The catalogue contains skills and instructions that implement Comet-related workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rpamis/comet --skill openspec-bulk-archive-changegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rpamis/cometWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/openspec-bulk-archive-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/openspec-bulk-archive-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/openspec-bulk-archive-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rpamis/comet/openspec-bulk-archive-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rpamis/comet/openspec-bulk-archive-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01847 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00924 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00369 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-bulk-archive-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
77% identical to molfeat — 453 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 247 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.
This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.
Input: None required (prompts for selection)
Steps
-
Get active changes
Run
openspec list --jsonto get all active changes.If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.
-
Prompt for change selection
Use AskUserQuestion tool with multi-select to let user choose changes:
- Show each change with its schema
- Include an option for "All changes"
- Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)
IMPORTANT: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.
-
Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes
For each selected change, collect:
a. Artifact status - Run
openspec status --change "<name>" --json- Parse
schemaNameandartifactslist - Note which artifacts are
donevs other states
b. Task completion - Read
openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md- Count
- [ ](incomplete) vs- [x](complete) - If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"
c. Delta specs - Check
openspec/changes/<name>/specs/directory- List which capability specs exist
- For each, extract requirement names (lines matching
### Requirement: <name>)
- Parse
-
Detect spec conflicts
Build a map of
capability -> [changes that touch it]:auth -> [change-a, change-b] <- CONFLICT (2+ changes) api -> [change-c] <- OK (only 1 change)A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.
-
Resolve conflicts agentically
For each conflict, investigate the codebase:
a. Read the delta specs from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify
b. Search the codebase for implementation evidence:
- Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
- Check for related files, functions, or tests
c. Determine resolution:
- If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
- If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
- If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user
d. Record resolution for each conflict:
- Which change's specs to apply
- In what order (if both)
- Rationale (what was found in codebase)
-
Show consolidated status table
Display a table summarizing all changes:
| Change | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs | Conflicts | Status | |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------| | schema-management | Done | 5/5 | 2 delta | None | Ready | | project-config | Done | 3/3 | 1 delta | None | Ready | | add-oauth | Done | 4/4 | 1 delta | auth (!) | Ready* | | add-verify-skill | 1 left | 2/5 | None | None | Warn |For conflicts, show the resolution:
* Conflict resolution: - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)For incomplete changes, show warnings:
Warnings: - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks -
Confirm batch operation
Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single confirmation:
- "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
- Options might include:
- "Archive all N changes"
- "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
- "Cancel"
If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.
-
Execute archive for each confirmed change
Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):
a. Sync specs if delta specs exist:
- Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)
- For conflicts, apply in resolved order
- Track if sync was done
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 247 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A ebdbe009a995
openspec-bulk-archive-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository rpamis/comet (2,957 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,847 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 77% identical to molfeat, differing in 453 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-request
Create, update, or scan per-task request tickets for progress tracking. These are date-prefixed non-lifecycle docs under requests/, NOT feature-level requirements (use /req-analyze for those). Use when: tracking task progress, updating completion status, scanning incomplete requests, checking request status dashboard.…
req-analyze
A requirements-analysis tool that breaks a problem into needs, stakeholders, and priorities before a technical solution is chosen.
recap-ask
Interactive Q&A over an existing recap document. Use when: user wants to ask follow-up questions about a briefing-recap- .md produced by /recap-doc, with recap-bounded context + out-of-scope redirect + optional promote-to-request. Not for: generating a new recap (use /recap-doc), general project Q&A (use /ask), code…
recap-doc
Post-development recap document generator. Use when: AI/Codex has implemented a feature and the user needs a guided walkthrough of what changed and why, with blind-spot detection and anticipated questions. Not for: Q&A follow-up (use /recap-ask), technical share-out for teammates (use /tech-brief), or generic code…
runbook
Generate and update feature release runbooks from existing docs and codebase. Use when: creating operational runbook, release handbook, deployment checklist, pre-release preparation. Not for: incident response (v2), code review (use codex-code-review), architecture design (use architecture).
jira
Jira integration — view issues, generate branches, create tickets, transition status. Use when: user mentions Jira ticket key (XX-123), says /jira, wants to create branch from ticket, create a new ticket, or update Jira status. Not for: GitHub issues (use issue-analyze).