refactor

refactor is a skill for Claude Code from rsmdt/the-startup. It costs 20 tokens per session (1,022 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for reorganizing and simplifying code while keeping its business behavior unchanged.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to reduce duplication, clarify dense code, improve names, replace magic numbers with named constants, and assess refactoring risks.
Why use it?
It helps make code easier to read and maintain without intentionally changing what the software does.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the start plugin — 17 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to reduce duplication, clarify dense code, improve names, replace magic numbers with named constants, and assess refactoring risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add rsmdt/the-startup --skill refactor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install start, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 17 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for refactor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for refactor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rsmdt/the-startup/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,022 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high System Prompt Leakage · line 53
    Skill contains instructions that could directly expose system prompts, internal rules, or hidden instructions to users or external parties.
    Fix: Remove any instructions that reveal, print, or output system prompts or internal rules. System instructions should never be exposed to end users.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.01022
Opus 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00409
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00204
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00102

Measured yesterday against content hash 6af5bff19a12, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 5 executable files (evals/files/order-service-failing-baseline/src/services/OrderService.js, evals/files/order-service-failing-baseline/src/utils/currency.js, evals/files/order-service-failing-baseline/test/currency.test.js, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/start/skills/refactor/SKILL.md · 119 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Persona

Act as a refactoring orchestrator that improves code quality while strictly preserving all existing behavior.

Refactoring Target: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

Finding { impact: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW title: string // max 40 chars location: string // shortest unique path + line problem: string // one sentence refactoring: string // specific technique to apply risk: string // potential complications }

State { target = $ARGUMENTS perspectives = [] // from reference/perspectives.md mode: Standard | Agent Team | Dynamic Workflow baseline: string findings: Finding[] }

In scope: Code structure, internal implementation, naming, duplication, readability, dependencies. Specific techniques: nested ternaries to if/else or switch, dense one-liners to multi-line with clear steps, clever tricks to obvious implementations, abbreviations to descriptive names, magic numbers to named constants. Out of scope: External behavior, public API contracts, business logic results, side effect ordering.

Constraints

Always:

  • Delegate all analysis tasks to specialist agents.
  • Establish test baseline before any changes.
  • Run tests after EVERY individual change.
  • One refactoring at a time — never batch changes before verification.
  • Revert immediately if tests fail or behavior changes.
  • Get user approval before refactoring untested code.

Never:

  • Change external behavior, public API contracts, or business logic results.

Reference Materials

  • reference/perspectives.md — analysis perspectives
  • reference/code-smells.md — smell catalog
  • reference/output-format.md — output guidelines
  • examples/output-example.md — output example

Workflow

1. Establish Baseline

Locate target code from $ARGUMENTS. Run existing tests to establish baseline. Read reference/output-format.md and format the baseline report accordingly.

match (baseline) { tests failing => stop, report to user coverage gaps => ask the user to choose: Add tests first (recommended) | Proceed without coverage | Cancel ready => continue }

Read the full file on GitHub · 119 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · +5 lines 6af5bff19a12
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 114 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A a8997dd0f721

Subscribe to this mod's changes

refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository rsmdt/the-startup (575 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,022 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

security-architecture-review

Reviews a design or change for security before it ships — authentication and authorization, data handling, secrets, dependencies, and the secure-development practices around it. Use this to review an architecture or pull request for security, set secure coding standards, choose or tune SAST and DAST tooling, assess a…

cbrock84/headcount · 78 tokens

code-review

Conducts and responds to code review — reviewing a change for correctness, design, and risk, and evaluating review feedback received on your own work. Use this before merging, when asked to review a diff or pull request, when review feedback has arrived and needs acting on, or when feedback seems wrong and needs a…

cbrock84/headcount · 72 tokens

audit-project

Run an iterative multi-agent code audit until critical and high findings are resolved. Use when the user says "audit my code", "find all the bugs", "deep code audit", "iterative review", or "review until clean".

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin · 50 tokens

create-pull-request

Use when asked to create or update a PR, revise its description, or link issue references to its body. Not for multi-PR stacks: use gate-and-merge. Not for releases: use git-workflow-and-versioning.

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin · 52 tokens

gate-and-merge

Use when landing a queue of open PRs: gate each PR, sweep its review feedback to root cause, then merge, repair, hold, or close it. Human-only.

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin · 41 tokens

doubt-driven

Use when a non-trivial decision sits under uncertainty and correctness matters more than speed. Not for patch review: use review. Not for plan attacks: use load-bearing-assumption-test.

OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin · 41 tokens