Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.00448 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00224 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review
Give the human reviewer a running start: review the diff for correctness and security, and post one focused comment on what to look at. It is not a replacement for QA or a human reviewer — it sets the starting point and typically makes review meaningfully faster.
Customization
Before executing, check ~/.claude/LIFEOS/USER/CUSTOMIZATIONS/SKILLS/Review/PREFERENCES.md. If present, load and apply it; otherwise use defaults.
Prerequisites
- buddy + LifeOS installed (
test -f ~/.claude/LIFEOS/VERSION). - A git repo with changes or a PR. GitHub integration via the GitHub MCP or the
ghCLI (degrade to a printed comment if neither is present).
Workflow Routing
| Workflow | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| ReviewChanges | Any /sdlc:review invocation |
Workflows/ReviewChanges.md |
Template
Templates/ReviewComment.md — the single structured comment shape.
GitHub Action
ReviewChanges can optionally write .github/workflows/claude-review.yml so every PR is reviewed automatically (requires the repo to hold an auth token/secret). The action runs the same review on the PR diff and posts one comment.
Output
One structured review comment (posted to the PR via MCP/gh, or printed).
Examples
User: "/sdlc:review 42"
→ Fetches the diff for PR #42 (gh pr diff / GitHub MCP)
→ Reviews correctness + security
→ Posts a single structured comment: summary, findings by severity, what to check manually
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 45 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 554f4f089907
Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository rsts-dev/claude-buddy-marketplace (17 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 448 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…