Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint --skill legacy-contextgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/legacy-context)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/legacy-context"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/legacy-context/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/legacy-context"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/legacy-context.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.08568 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.04284 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01714 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00857 |
Grade A, and why
legacy-context scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s -u ":$AZURE_DEVOPS_EXT_PAT" \ How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 707 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legacy Context
Most context-engineering techniques assume layers 1 and 2 of tiered lookup (semantic memory and structured docs) already contain useful information. In consolidated codebases this assumption breaks. There are no ADRs, no post-mortems indexed, no runbooks, no skill memory. Tiered lookup collapses to layer 3 (raw code) and every session pays the full reading cost again.
This skill runs before context-engineering becomes useful. It does code archaeology and writes discovery notes, ADR candidates, and intent marker suggestions into the empty layers, so that the next sessions can use the cheaper layers as designed.
The skill is read-only for source code. It never edits source files. It
writes only to memory/discoveries/, docs/architecture/_candidates/,
and emits intent marker patches for human review.
Operating principle
Bias toward completeness. When in doubt, capture more, not less. In consolidated codebases, the contextual gem is usually the comment buried in a 6-year-old PR review or the issue closed as "wontfix" with three paragraphs of reasoning. Missing those is a worse failure than producing verbose discovery notes.
This bias is reflected in the defaults: the early-exit heuristic in Phase 3 is disabled by default, the trunk-based threshold is set conservatively (30% PR coverage), and commit message scans extend automatically when remote layers prove thin. Users who prefer speed over completeness can flip the relevant flags in the "Tuning" section of Phase 1.
Supported remote providers
| Provider | Detection | Auth | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub | URL contains github.com |
gh auth status |
Full feature parity |
| Azure DevOps | URL contains dev.azure.com or .visualstudio.com |
AZURE_DEVOPS_EXT_PAT env var (no az login needed) |
No reactions on comments; releases mapped to git tags |
| Other (GitLab, Bitbucket, self-hosted) | Anything else | n/a | Phase 3 skipped with warning |
Rules
- Read source, write context. Never modify source files. All output goes to discovery notes, ADR candidates, or marker patches for review.
- Discovery before implementation. This skill does not implement
features. If implementation is needed, hand off to
/implementafter discovery completes. - Why, not what. Source code already shows what runs. Discovery captures why it exists, what depends on it, and what breaks if changed.
- Cover the path entirely on remote. Remote discovery iterates every file in the path, not just the priority ones from the survey. A "warm" file with no commit pattern may still have a critical PR discussion attached to it.
- Cap source-code reading depth, not remote breadth. If a single source file exceeds 2,000 lines, treat it as a sub-module and recurse. On remote, do not cap by top-N. Stratify by discussion density instead.
- Outputs go to predictable paths. Other skills (memory, incoherence detector, ADR) consume the discovery output. Keep file naming consistent across providers.
- Same output across providers. Phase 3 produces identical file structure whether running on GitHub or Azure DevOps. Downstream phases should not need to know which provider generated the data.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 707 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A ee5405505a7f
legacy-context is a skill published in the GitHub repository rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint (20 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 8,568 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
truecourse-hooks
Install, configure, or remove the TrueCourse pre-commit hook.
truecourse-analyze
Run TrueCourse architecture analysis on this repository.
init-workspace-documentation
Skill "init-workspace-documentation" from griddynamics/rosetta, covering agent memory.md, agent memory, preventive rules, what worked and what failed.
truecourse-fix
Fix TrueCourse violations that have suggested fixes.
truecourse-list
List TrueCourse violations found in this repository.
release
Guide through the Cortex TMS release process — version bump, changelog, sync, tag, publish. Every step requires user approval.